Research Article |
|
Corresponding author: Lasha-Giorgi Japaridze ( lgjaparidze@gmail.com ) Academic editor: Levan Mumladze
© 2025 Lasha-Giorgi Japaridze, Armen Seropian.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Japaridze L-G, Seropian A (2025) Unwanted guests: The first records of two established non-native moth species in the Caucasus, with notes on non-native fauna of Georgia. Caucasiana 4: 137-151. https://doi.org/10.3897/caucasiana.4.e168433
|
This study aims to expand our current knowledge of biological invasions of Georgia by reporting the first records of two non-native moth genera Micromelalopha Nagano, 1916 (Notodontidae), and Antheraea Hübner, 1819 (Saturniidae) from the South Caucasus, based on three male specimens of Micromelalopha sieversi (Staudinger, 1892) and five male specimens of Antheraea pernyi (Guérin-Méneville, 1855). These findings are based on recent field collections, supported by morphological examination and DNA barcoding, and contribute to a better understanding of the region's shifting lepidopteran fauna and potential bio-invasion risks. Additionally, we provide the first comprehensive list of non-native animal species recorded in Georgia, based on literary and online sources.
Antheraea pernyi, barcoding, Lepidoptera, Micromelalopha sieversi, new records, Notodontidae, Saturniidae, South Caucasus
Despite being well defined in a scientific context, the distinction between non-native, and invasive species is often misunderstood by the general public. A non-native species refers to any organism found outside its native range, typically as a result of human activity. In contrast, an invasive species is a subset of these non-native species that, once introduced to a new environment (with or without human mediation), becomes established and causes ecological and economic harm (
The South Caucasus region, and particularly the Black Sea coast of Georgia, has proved a conducive environment for introduced and invasive invertebrate species, largely due to its favourable climate. This influx has negatively impacted both the ecological balance and economic stability of the region. The earliest documented record of a non-native species in the region is Samia cynthia (Drury, 1773), a species native to East Asia, which was intentionally introduced to north-western Georgia in around 1860 for silk production; it subsequently established a local population in western Georgia (
The present study contributes to the growing body of research on non-native and potentially invasive species in Georgia by reporting the first records of two Lepidopteran genera, Micromelalopha Nagano, 1916 (Notodontidae), and Antheraea Hübner, 1819 (Saturniidae) in the South Caucasus. These findings are based on recent specimen collections and supported by morphological analysis and DNA barcoding. The documentation of these genera marks a significant addition to the region’s lepidopteran fauna and raises questions about their origin, potential impact, and future distribution.
The specimens were gathered either by attracting the moths to light or collecting them manually. Location (given in WGS84) and elevation data were obtained using a Garmin MAP 64s GPS. The examined material is kept in a private collection of the senior author (hereafter as JLGT). Specimen identification was carried out using both external morphological characters and DNA barcoding. For morphological identification we used keys by
The barcoding of M. sieversi was carried out within the Wellcome Sanger Institute’s BIOSCAN project (Hobern 2020), while A. pernyi was barcoded during the Caucasus Barcode of Life project (CaBOL) using the standardised protocol described in
In total, eight specimens (all males) were examined, they comprised two genera both of which represented the first records in the Caucasus. The list below is given in alphabetical order.
The Notodontidae (prominent moths) are medium-sized moths, usually with cryptic colouration. Many species have distinctive tufts or projections on the forewings, front legs, or thorax, which give the family its name. The family is most diverse in temperate regions, especially in forests. In the territory of Georgia, it is represented by 35 species comprised in 18 genera (Georgian Biodiversity Database – hereafter GBD).
The genus comprises about 25 species, most of which occur in East Asia. They are distributed in China, Japan, Korea, Russia (Primorsky Krai) , Afghanistan, India, Nepal, Vietnam, Philippines, Malaysia and Indonesia (
Micromelalopha sieversi:
Georgia • 2♂; Dighomi Massive, Tbilisi; 21 Jun. 2023; leg: A. Seropian; JLGT • 1♂; Sanzona, Tbilisi; 2 August 2025; leg. L-G. Japaridze; JLGT.
For diagnosis, see
We obtained a single sequence (BOLD:ACQ7797), identical to those of M. sieversi from China (BOLD:ACQ7797).
In China, where this species originates, it is an important pest of poplar trees. Commonly, it occurs in 3–4 generations in north-east China, and in 5–7 generations in central and southern China (
Members of Saturniidae are medium to very large moths, usually with robust, hairy bodies and broad wings, often bearing conspicuous eyespots or transparent hyaline “windows.” Antennae are bipectinate in both sexes, strongly so in males. The family is most diverse in tropical regions (
The genus is one of the most diverse within the family, comprising more than 100 species, most of which occur in tropics of East Asia and South America (
Antheraea pernyi: Pinya et al. 2013: 377, fig. 1 (♂)
GEORGIA • 2♂; Imereti, Baghdati; 6 May 2021; leg: G. Gorgodze; JLGT • 1♂ (CaBOL-ID 1021655); Ilemi; leg: T. Lomidze; 16 June 2021; JLGT • 1♂; Vartsikhe; leg: A. Babunashvili; 5 April 2024; JLGT • 1♂; Ajameti; leg: A. Bubunashvili; 29 April 2024; JLGT.
For diagnosis, see
We obtained a single sequence from the specimen CaBOL-ID 1021655 (BOLD:ABY5349), identical to those of A. pernyi from Russia (Siberia), India, North Korea, South Korea, and China (BOLD:ABY5349).
Originally native to China, where it was domesticated for silk production, A. pernyi is also distributed across Mongolia, northern China, India, and Japan. The main food source for its larvae are Quercus species (
Despite growing awareness, comprehensive data on non-native and invasive invertebrates in Georgia remain limited, underlining the need for systematic monitoring, early detection, and regional collaboration to assess and mitigate their impacts. In 2014, the box tree moth Cydalima perspectalis (Walker, 1859) was recorded for the first time in Georgia (
A notable trend among terrestrial biological invasions is the geographical origin of these species. The climate and ecological conditions of the South Caucasus region, particularly Georgia, appear highly favourable for the establishment of many East Asian species. This pattern presents substantial risks to native biodiversity, agriculture, and forest ecosystems.
In the absence of a comprehensive list of non-native animal species introduced to Georgia in the recent historical period, we have attempted to compile available data from published sources and platforms, such as iNaturalist (with “Research Grade” status) and GBD. A single observation of a non-native freshwater jellyfish (Craspedacusta sowerbii) Lankester, 1880 was kindly provided by the founder of EcoFilms, Nika Tsiklauri (hereafter - EcoFilms). The present list of non-native taxa consists of 134 species (see Table
| Taxon name | Presence in Georgia according to: | |
|---|---|---|
| Chordata | ||
| Mammalia | ||
| Artiodactyla | ||
| 1 | Cervus nippon |
|
| Carnivora | ||
| 2 | Neogale vision |
|
| 3 | Nyctereutes procyonoides |
|
| 4 | Procyon lotor |
|
| Rodentia | ||
| 5 | Hystrix indica |
|
| 6 | Myocastor coypus |
|
| 7 | Ondatra zibethicus |
|
| 8 | Sciurus vulgaris |
|
| Reptilia | ||
| Squamata | ||
| 9 | Phoenicolacerta laevis |
|
| Testudines | ||
| 10 | Trachemys scripta | iNaturalist |
| Pisces | ||
| Acanthuriformes | ||
| 11 | Sarpa salpa |
|
| 12 | Sparus aurata |
|
| Blenniiformes | ||
| 13 | Parablennius incognitus |
|
| Cichliformes | ||
| 14 | Oreochromis niloticus |
|
| Clupeiformis | ||
| 18 | Sardinella aurita |
|
| Cypriniformes | ||
| 16 | Carassius gibelio |
|
| 17 | Ctenopharyngodon idella |
|
| 18 | Cyprinus carpio |
|
| 19 | Gobio artvinicus |
|
| 20 | Gobio caucasicus |
|
| 21 | Hemiculter leucisculus |
|
| 22 | Hypophthalmichthys molitrix |
|
| 23 | Hypophthalmichthys nobilis |
|
| 24 | Pseudorasbora parva |
|
| Cyprinodontiformes | ||
| 25 | Gambusia holbrooki |
|
| Esociformes | ||
| 26 | Esox lucius |
|
| Eupercaria /misc | ||
| 27 | Lithognathus mormyrus |
|
| 28 | Morone saxatilis |
|
| Gobiiformes | ||
| 29 | Gobius xanthocephalus |
|
| 30 | Neogobius fluviatilis |
|
| 31 | Pomatoschistus bathi |
|
| 32 | Rhinogobius lindbergi |
|
| Mugiliformes | ||
| 33 | Planiliza haematocheilus |
|
| Perciformes | ||
| 34 | Gymnocephalus cernua |
|
| 35 | Perca fluviatilis |
|
| 36 | Sander lucioperca |
|
| Salmoniformes | ||
| 37 | Coregonus albula |
|
| 38 | Oncorhynchus mykiss |
|
| 39 | Salmo gegarkuni |
|
| Siluriformes | ||
| 40 | Silurus glanis |
|
| Syngnathiformes | ||
| 41 | Syngnathus abaster |
|
| Invertebrata | ||
| Arthropoda | ||
| Arachnida | ||
| Araneae | ||
| 42 | Theridula gonygaster |
|
| Copepoda | ||
| Calanoida | ||
| 43 | Acartia tonsa |
|
| Cyclopoida | ||
| 44 | Oithona davisae |
|
| Diplopoda | ||
| Polydesmida | ||
| 45 | Oxidus gracilis |
|
| Malacostraca | ||
| Amphipoda | ||
| 46 | Melita nitida |
|
| Decapoda | ||
| 47 | Callinectes sapidus |
|
| 48 | Macrobrachium nipponense | Macrobrachium nipponense. Georgian Biodiversity Database |
| 49 | Penaeus semisulcatus |
|
| 50 | Pontastacus leptodactylus |
|
| 51 | Rhithropanopeus harrisii |
|
| Thecostraca | ||
| Balanomorpha | ||
| 52 | Amphibalanus eburneus |
|
| 53 | Amphibalanus improvisus |
|
| Coleoptera | ||
| 54 | Acanthoscelides obtectus |
|
| 55 | Bruchidius siliquastri |
|
| 56 | Bruchidius terrenus |
|
| 57 | Callidiellum rufipenne |
|
| 58 | Cercyon laminatus |
|
| 59 | Cryptolaemus montrouzieri |
|
| 60 | Cryptopleurum subtile |
|
| 61 | Dendroctonus micans |
|
| 62 | Epitrix hirtipennis |
|
| 63 | Epuraea ocularis | Tsinkevich and Solodnikov 2024 |
| 64 | Harmonia axyridis |
|
| 65 | Lamprodila festiva | iNaturalist |
| 66 | Leptinotarsa decemlineata |
|
| 67 | Litargus balteatus |
|
| 68 | Lyctus brunneus |
|
| 69 | Maladera castanea |
|
| 70 | Megabruchidius dorsalis |
|
| 71 | Naupactus cervinus |
|
| 72 | Rhizophagus grandis |
|
| 73 | Rhynchophorus ferrugineus |
|
| 74 | Rhyzobius lophanthae |
|
| 75 | Rodolia cardinalis |
|
| 76 | Serangium montazerii |
|
| 77 | Stelidota geminata | Tsinkevich and Solodnikov 2024 |
| 78 | Xanthogaleruca luteola |
|
| 79 | Xylosandrus germanus |
|
| 80 | Zygogramma suturalis |
|
| Diptera | ||
| 81 | Drosophila suzukii |
|
| 82 | Hermetia illucens | iNaturalist |
| 83 | Obolodiplosis robiniae |
|
| 84 | Trichopoda pictipennis | iNaturalist |
| Hemiptera | ||
| 85 | Aphis forbesi |
|
| 86 | Ceroplastes japonicas |
|
| 87 | Corythucha arcuata |
|
| 88 | Corythucha ciliata |
|
| 89 | Daktulosphaira vitifoliae |
|
| 90 | Dialeurodes citri |
|
| 91 | Eriosoma lanigerum |
|
| 92 | Halyomorpha halys |
|
| 93 | Icerya purchasi |
|
| 94 | Leptoglossus occidentalis |
|
| 95 | Lopholeucaspis japonica |
|
| 96 | Metcalfa pruinosa | iNaturalist |
| 97 | Orosanga japonica |
|
| 98 | Pseudococcus calceolariae |
|
| 99 | Stictocephala bisonia |
|
| Hymenoptera | ||
| 100 | Aphelinus mali |
|
| 101 | Microterys clauseni |
|
| 102 | Scutellista caerulea |
|
| Lepidoptera | ||
| 103 | Antheraea pernyi | Present study |
| 104 | Cameraria ohridella |
|
| 105 | Cydalima perspectalis |
|
| 106 | Haritalodes derogata | iNaturalist |
| 107 | Haplochrois theae |
|
| 108 | Hyphantria cunea |
|
| 109 | Glyphodes pyloalis |
|
| 110 | Micromelalopha sieversi | Present study |
| 111 | Paysandisia archon |
|
| 112 | Phthorimaea operculella |
|
| 113 | Phyllonorycter platani |
|
| 114 | Plodia interpunctella |
|
| 115 | Samia cynthia |
|
| 116 | Tuta absoluta | Khositashvili and Khositasvili 2021 |
| Orthoptera | ||
| 117 | Svistella bifasciata | iNaturalist |
| 118 | Velarifictorus micado |
|
| Psocoptera | ||
| 119 | Dorypteryx domestica |
|
| Annelida | ||
| Polychaeta | ||
| Phyllodocida | ||
| 120 | Sigambra tentaculata |
|
| Sabellida | ||
| 121 | Ficopomatus enigmaticus |
|
| Spionida | ||
| 122 | Dipolydora quadrilobata |
|
| 123 | Polydora ciliata | Surugui 2005 |
| Mollusca | ||
| Bivalvia | ||
| Arcida | ||
| 124 | Anadara kagoshimensis |
|
| Myida | ||
| 125 | Mya arenaria |
|
| 126 | Mytilopsis leucophaeata |
|
| Venerida | ||
| 127 | Corbicula fluminalis |
|
| Gastropoda | ||
| Hygrophila | ||
| Physidae | ||
| 128 | Physella acuta |
|
| Lymnaeoidea | ||
| Planorbidae | ||
| 129 | Ferrissia californica |
|
| Neogastropoda | ||
| 130 | Rapana venosa |
|
| Stylommatophora | ||
| 131 | Eobania vermiculata |
|
| Cnidaria | ||
| Hydrozoa | ||
| Limnomedusae | ||
| 132 | Craspedacusta sowerbii | EcoFilms |
| Ctenophora | ||
| Nuda | ||
| Beroida | ||
| 133 | Beroe ovata |
|
| Tentaculata | ||
| Lobata | ||
| 134 | Mnemiopsis leidyi |
|
Cordial thanks to Giorg Gorgodze, Tengo Lomidze, and Alexandre Bubunashvili (all of Tbilisi, Georgia) for collecting and donating the specimens of Antheraea pernyi for the current study and Nika Tsiklauri for sharing the record of Craspedacusta sowerbii. Cordial thanks to the anonymous reviewers and Levan Mumladze (Editor) for their valuable suggestions. Special thanks to Henry Schofield for revising the English of the final version of the accepted manuscript.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
No ethical statement was reported.
This study has benefited from the Caucasus Barcode of Life (CaBOL) project, funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (grant number 01DK20014A), and the BIOSCAN project (grant number 6075006), which was performed within the EU-funded Biodiversity Genomics Europe (BGE) initiative.
Conceptualisation (L-GJ), original draft writing (L-GJ, AS), material collection (L-GJ, AS), visualisation (AS), data curation (L-GJ, AS).
Lasha-Giorgi Japaridze https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7171-5589
Armen Seropian https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3777-9954
All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.