Research Article
Print
Research Article
DNA barcoding of some Anura species from Rize
expand article infoBaşak Gür, Tuğba E. Kalaycı
‡ Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Turkiye
Open Access

Abstract

The use of COI barcodes for specimen identification and species discovery has proven to be a functional molecular approach in the study of Anura. In this study, we evaluated the genetic status of Bufo bufo, Hyla orientalis, and Rana macrocnemis from different parts of Rize, Türkiye, using the COI gene marker, a popular method known as DNA barcoding. The Caucasus region is known to host a substantial amount of global biodiversity; however, limited barcoding studies are available for vertebrate taxa within this region. We have submitted all generated sequences to the BOLD data system, with the majority representing the first data from Rize in this database. Our analysis revealed four distinct barcode index numbers belonging to members of three different families. We observed a genetic distance of 0.038 between B. bufo specimens from İyidere and Çamlıhemşin. Within R. macrocnemis, genetic distances ranged from 0.018 to 0.020, and within H. orientalis, they ranged from 0.01 to 0.02. Our findings indicate that COI sequencing is a useful tool for the identification of anuran species present in Rize.

Key words:

COI, Anura, Caucasian, biodiversity

Introduction

DNA barcoding is a genetic-based tool to identify and authenticate species using short DNA sequences. Different gene regions are used in DNA barcoding, however, the most frequently preferred gene region for animals is Cytochrome C Oxidase Subunit I (COI). Barcode of Life Database (BOLD) is a database that supports the recording, storing, and open publishing of barcoded DNA. In the DNA barcoding approach, DNA sequences of a specific, short and standardized genomic region are compared with a reference database (Savolainen et al. 2005; Hajibabaei et al. 2007). The standard genomic region used in DNA barcoding of animals is a 648-bp long fragment of the mitochondrial COI gene (Hebert et al. 2003). COI has proven highly efficient and reliable in many animal groups and is regularly used for various applications, such as for instance biodiversity assessments (Nagy et al. 2012; Hawlitschek et al. 2013).

The Caucasus region is among the most crucial global biodiversity hotspots, harboring rich endemic fauna and flora (Myers et al. 2000; Zazanashvili et al. 2004). Rize is one of the most spectacular provinces of the region in terms of biodiversity, due to its current climate characteristics, which include cool summers, mild winters, and rainy seasons throughout the year (Polat and Sunkar 2017). Some habitats are on the list of protected ecoregions declared by the IUCN (Heywood and Davis 1994), especially in the Kaçkar Mountains. Rize province hosts approximately 25% of amphibian species distributed throughout Türkiye. This study is the first to barcode the amphibians of Rize. DNA barcoding was applied to Hyla orientalis, Bufo bufo, and Rana macrocnemis from parts of Rize province.

During the study, we tested the universal amphibian primers, optimised reaction conditions, and sequenced the barcoding gene COI from various amphibian species, some of which were previously out of the focus of barcoding. We could identify the species or interspecific lineages based on the obtained sequences using bioinformatics and phylogenetic methods.

Materials and methods

We sampled 16 individuals from different localities in Rize (Türkiye) (Table 1). We obtained muscle tissue from individuals by toe-clipping during fieldwork and stored it in 95% alcohol. Total DNA was extracted from tissue samples using a Nucleospin DNA isolation kit (Macherey Nagel, Germany). We used a universal primer mix (comprising equal proportions of forward primers COI-C01 and COI-C02 and reverse primers COI-C03 and COI-C04) designed by Che et al. (2012) for polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Only COI-C01 and COI-C03 primers were used for sequencing. The following PCR protocol was used for amplification: initial denaturation for 5 min at 95°C; 36 cycles of denaturation for 1 min at 95°C, annealing for 1 min at 46°C, an extension for 1.15 min at 72°C; and final extension for 10 min at 72°C. PCR amplicons were confirmed by gel electrophoresis on a 0.8 % agarose gel containing ethidium bromide. We checked and edited the sequences via the software BioEdit (Hall, 1999). We submitted sequences to BOLD systems (Table 1). The operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were additionally inferred through Refined Single Linkage (RESL) analyses on BOLD (Ratnasingham and Hebert 2013). RESL was developed as a stepwise clustering process that uses single-link clustering as a tool for the preliminary assignment of records to an OTU. We used this method via the ‘Cluster Sequences’ tool available on the BOLD platform (https://www.boldsystems.org, accessed on 6 August 2024). We also assigned species through delimitation tests, such as Assemble Species by Automatic Partitioning (ASAP). (ASAP) (Puillandre et al. 2021) and Automatic Barcode Gap (ABGD) (Puillandre et al. 2012). ABGD was used to test for a barcode gap in the COI sequences of all amphibians (Relative gap = 1, Pmin=0.001, Pmax=0.1, Steps=10, NBins=10, K2P). ASAP is a recently developed method that infers the number of OTUs by implementing a hierarchal clustering algorithm based on pairwise genetic distances from single-locus sequence alignments (Puillandre et al. 2021).

Table 1.

Descriptive data for specimens from this study; N – Number of individuals.

Species N Locality Haplotype BOLD process ID Base pair (bp) Source
Hyla orientalis 580
5 City Center (Rize) H1, H2 RZE009-23-RZE013-23 This study
2 Lenkaran (Azerbaijan) H3 AAE5180 BOLD
1 Taşköprü (Kastamonu) H4 AAE5180 BOLD
3 Krym (Ukraine) H5, H6, AAE5180 BOLD
1 Mediterranean H7 AAE5180 BOLD
Bufo bufo 642
3 İyidere (Rize) H1, H2, H3 RZE014-24-RZE016-24 This study
4 Çat (Çamlıhemşin) H1, H2, H3 RZE001-23-RZE004-23 This study
1 Russia H4 ABAAP009-08 BOLD
1 Ukraine H4 ABAAP045-08 BOLD
8 Austria H4, H5, H6, H7, H8 BCAHF044-17 BOLD
BCAHF049-17
BCAHF050-17
BCAHF098-17
BCAHF127-19
BCAHF144-19
BCAHF167-19
BCAHF170-19
11 Germany (Bavaria) H4, H9, H10, H11 FBHER016-09 BOLD
FBHER017-09
FBHER042-09
FBHER043-09
FBHER044-09
FBHER050-09
FBHER052-09
FBHER059-09
FBHER060-09
FBHER084-09
FBHER085-09
3 Norway (Akershus) H4, H13 HERNO009-18 BOLD
HERNO010-18
HERNO011-18
1 Mediterranean H12 GBAP20347-19 BOLD (Ehl et al. 2019)
5 Russia H14, H15 ABAAP001-08 BOLD
ABAAP004-08
ABAAP005-08
ABAAP007-08
ABAAP042-08
4 Georgia H16, H17 ABAAP146-08 BOLD
ABAAP147-08
ABAAP148-08
ABAAP149-08
R. macrocnemis 510
4 Çamlıhemşin (Rize) H5, H6, H7 RZE005-23-RZE007-23 This study
1 Kars (Susuz) H1 ABAAP108-08 BOLD
1 Hakkari (Beytuşebap) H2, H3 ABAAP113-08 BOLD
ABAAP115-08
ABAAP116-08
ABAAP117-08
1 Armenia (Garrni) H4 ABAAP122-08 BOLD

Pairwise p-distances were used to calculate genetic divergences among species and genera with 500 replicates implemented in MEGA X (Kumar et al. 2018). We compared our sequences with data obtained from the BOLD system for each species. We calculated the number of haplotypes for each species and haplotype networks were reconstructed using Hapsolutely (Vences et al. 2024).

Results

Specimens of Bufo from Çat plateau (Kaçkar Mountains in Çamlıhemşin) and the İyidere (Rize) region were assigned different BIN numbers in the BOLD system (Tables 2 and 3), indicating the existence of two different lineages. Specimens from Çat were grouped with specimens from Georgia according to the BOLD identification system and identified as B. verrucosissimus. ASAP and ABGD tests assigned two OTUs for the B. bufo specimens from İyidere and Çat. For this lineage, we found a low genetic distance between specimens from Türkiye, Georgia, and Russia (Rize–Türkiye and Russia: 0.017; Türkiye and Georgia: 0.003). Haplotype network analysis revealed the same genetic relationships among localities (Fig. 1). The sequences of specimens from İyidere were assigned to B. bufo in the BOLD System. For this lineage, we found the mean genetic distance between specimens to be 0.038, ranging from 0.03 to 0.05. For this lineage, the genetic distance between specimens from İyidere (Rize, Türkiye) and the BOLD database (Ukraine, Russia, Austria, Germany, Norway) was 0.03 in all cases. According to haplotype network analysis, B. bufo specimens from European localities are genetically close to each other. However, researchers noted asymmetric mtDNA introgression in B. bufo species in Rize (Dursun et al. 2023). We found 17 haplotypes for the two mitochondrial lineages of B. bufo from our data and the BOLD system (both submitted as B. bufo and B. verrucosissimus). Specimens from İyidere and Çamlıhemşin were grouped in the same position on the haplotype network (Fig. 1A). Haplotypes of specimens from Georgia and Türkiye are situated close together. On the other hand, specimens submitted as B. bufo were grouped in haplotype network analysis (Table 1; Fig. 1).

Table 2.

Summary Report for Cluster Sequence Result from BOLD database

OTU Mean Genetic Distance Maximum Genetic Distance Species
OTU-1 0.35 0.48 The mitochondrial lineage of B. bufo (Çamlıhemşin; Rize, Türkiye)
OTU-2 0.20 0.39 R. macrocnemis
OTU-3 0.76 1.90 H. orientalis
OTU-4 1.80 2.32 The mitochondrial lineage of B. bufo (İyidere; Rize, Türkiye)
Table 3.

BIN number and p distances among specimens from Rize and data from BOLD

Species BOLD BIN Number p-distances
The mitochrondrial lineage of B. bufo (İyidere; Rize, Türkiye) ACE5152 0.017 (B. verrucosissimus, Russia); 0.03 (B. verrucosissimus, Georgia)
The mitochondrial lineage of B. bufo (Çamlıhemşin; Rize, Türkiye) AAC2139 0.03 (B. bufo, Ukraine, Russia, Austria, Germany and Norway)
H. orientalis AAE5180 0.01 (H. orientalis, Azerbaijan) 0.02 (H. orientalis, Kastamonu; Türkiye) 0.01 (H. orientalis, Ukraine)
R. macrocnemis AFG1725 0.018 (R. macrocnemis, Hakkari and Kars) 0.02 (R. macrocnemis, Armenia)
Figures 1. 

Haplotype network of species from Rize and BOLD data specimens (Haplotype data is given in Table 1).

Rana macrocnemis – We found the genetic distance between Çamlıhemşin (Rize, Türkiye) and Kars (Türkiye) as 0.018, Hakkari (Türkiye) as 0.018, and Armenia 0.020. According to haplotype network analysis, we also found low genetic differences (Fig. 1).

Hyla orientalis – Genetic distance was 0.01 between Azerbaijan and Rize (Türkiye) specimens, 0.02 between Kastamonu (Türkiye) and Rize (Türkiye) specimens, and 0.01 between Ukraine and Rize (Türkiye) specimens in H. orientalis. Specimens from Rize (Türkiye) are more similar to specimens from Ukraine and Azerbaijan than those from Kastamonu (Türkiye) (Fig. 1).

Despite RESL analysis being given four OTUs (Table 2), the other two discrimination tests (ASAP and ABGD) gave three OTUs for specimens (H. orientalis, R. macrocnemis and B. bufo) from Rize. We found the barcode gap distance to be 0.12 in the ABGD analysis. The sequence partition with the lowest ASAP score (1.5) distributed the sequences into 3 OTUs, and the threshold distance value was 0.116073.

Discussion

The Caucasus belongs to two (Caucasus and Irano-Anatolian) of the 36 global biodiversity hotspots (Myers et al. 2000; Mittermeier et al. 2011; Noss et al. 2015; Habel et al. 2020). The diversity of most animal taxonomic groups in this region is poorly understood, and a significant portion of the biodiversity data is outdated and incomplete (e.g., Mumladze et al. 2020). The Eastern Black Sea region is one of the most biologically rich regions in Türkiye, and Rize harbors a substantial part of this region’s endemic fauna. This study represents the first application of DNA barcoding to identify Rize’s amphibian fauna. We also present the initial barcoding data for two mitochondrial leages of Bufo bufo in the BOLD system from Türkiye.

Jablonski and Sadek (2019) asserted that populations from the Levant belong to B. verrucosissimus, closely affiliated with populations from the South Caucasian region rather than southern Türkiye, based on 16S rRNA. Dursun et al. (2023) estimated genetic differences between B. bufo specimens from Çamlıhemşin and İyidere as 0.023-0.026, according to the Cytochrome b (Cyt-b) gene region. We found a higher genetic distance using the COI gene region. More variable results were observed using mtDNA than nDNA in the Bufo species complex. Although we found moderate genetic differentiation between İyidere and Çamlıhemşin specimens, they appeared as the same haplotype in network analysis. Researchers have repeatedly noted that mtDNA oversplits species from hybrid zones in the Bufo species complex, attributed to asymmetric mtDNA introgression (Dursun et al. 2023).

Recuero et al. (2012) reported that the mean uncorrected pairwise genetic distances within B. bufo were 0.8% for combined 16S and Cyt-b data. We found the mean corrected distance ranged from 0.3-0.5% for two mitochondrial lineages of B. bufo. We determined that mitochondrial lineages of B. bufo from Rize, Türkiye, are genetically closer to Georgian specimens than to Russian, according to haplotype network analysis.

Genetic divergence of Rana macrocnemis is attributed to the last glaciation period, and gene flow among populations is restricted due to physical barriers and climate (Najibzadeh et al. 2017, 2021). Previously, genetic distances between R. macrocnemis populations were estimated as 0.002 and 0.016 within Türkiye (Kalaycı et al. 2017). In our case, the genetic distance was higher between the Çamlıhemşin (Rize, Türkiye) population and those from BOLD (Kars (Türkiye) (0.018), Hakkari (Türkiye) (0.018), Armenia (0.020), and an unknown locality from Türkiye (0.018)). We found no shared haplotypes among R. macrocnemis specimens in the Çamlıhemşin population.

Although we found low genetic differences among specimens from Azerbaijan, Kastamonu (Türkiye), Ukraine, and Rize (Türkiye) in Hyla orientalis, we found no shared haplotypes among localities. This species showed high genetic differentiation using nuclear markers in the Caucasian region (Birbele et al. 2023), while mtDNA usually yields lower divergence. Unusual environmental factors induced genetic variability in the H. orientalis population inhabiting the Chornobyl exclusion zone in Ukraine (Car et al. 2022). This could explain the discordance between mtDNA and nDNA differences in H. orientalis in this region.

Different species delimitation tests yielded somewhat different results for the classification of OTUs. For example, RESL gave four OTUs for the specimens from Rize (including two lineages of Bufo – resembling B. bufo and B. verrucosissimus as given in BOLD), while in contrast, ABGD and ASAP gave three OTUs (Table 2). In general, ASAP and ABGD were more conservative than RESL analysis (Macko et al. 2024). Nevertheless, the barcode data in BOLD databases are still incomplete (limited coverage of barcode variation or lacking certain species entirely), therefore accurate identification may be hindered. Interpreting the results can also be challenging (Abdi et al. 2024).

Researchers strongly recommend more local efforts to enrich the global list of barcoded species (Drohvalenko et al. 2019; Weigand et al. 2019). This study is the first to reveal the genetic diversity of Anura from the Rize region and to improve data accuracy in the universal database (BOLD). DNA barcoding is a vital tool for biodiversity research and conservation plans, offering promise for rapid species identification and biodiversity assessments in hotspot areas. We further encourage the use of DNA barcoding to monitor genetic diversity and resources across a wider geographic range and in specimens throughout Türkiye.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank for the editorial team of the Caucasiana Journal and the annonimous reviewers for their support in preparation of the final form of the manuscript.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

The 2209-A University Students Research Project Program supported this study (Grant Number: 1919B012111607) as the undergraduate thesis of Başak Gür.

Author contributions

BG - field and laboratory work, data analyses,, writing, review; TEK - study design, supervising, writing original draft.

Author ORCIDs

Başak Gür https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8152-0064

Tuğba E. Kalayci https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4790-0263

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.

References

  • Car C, Gilles A, Armant O, Burraco P, Beaugelin‐Seiller K, Gashchak S, Camilleri V, Cavalié I, Laloi P, Adam-Guillermin C, Orizaola G, Bonzom JM (2022) Unusual evolution of tree frog populations in the Chernobyl exclusion zone. Evolutionary applications 15(2): 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.13282
  • Drohvalenko M, Mykhailenko A, Rekrotchuk M, Shpak L, Shuba V, Trokhymchuk R, Utevsky S, Zinenko O (2019) Application of DNA barcoding in taxonomy and phylogeny: an individual case of COI partial gene sequencing from seven animal species. Vestnik Zoologii 53(5): 375–384. https://doi.org/10.2478/vzoo-2019-0034
  • Dursun C, Özdemir N, Gül S (2023) Easternmost distribution of Bufo bufo (Linnaeus, 1758) in Türkiye: implications for the putative contact zone between B. bufo and B. verrucosissimus. Genetica 151(1): 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-022-00175-5
  • Ehl S, Vences M, Veith M (2019) Reconstructing evolution at the community level: A case study on Mediterranean amphibians. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 134: 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2019.02.013
  • Hajibabaei M, Singer GA, Hebert PD, Hickey DA (2007) DNA barcoding: how it complements taxonomy, molecular phylogenetics and population genetics. Ttrends in Genetics 23(4): 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2007.02.001
  • Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95–98.
  • Hawlitschek O, Nagy ZT, Berger J, Glaw F (2013) Reliable DNA barcoding performance proved for species and island populations of Comoran squamate reptiles. PLoS One, 8(9): e73368. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073368
  • Hebert PD, Ratnasingham S, De Waard JR (2003) Barcoding animal life: Cytochrome C Oxidase Subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 270: S96–S99. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2003.0025
  • Heywood VH, Davis SD (1994) Centers of plant diversity. A guide and strategy for their conservation.Volume. 1. Europe, Africa, South West Asia and the Middle East. IUCN Publications, Cambridge.
  • Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K (2018) MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Molecular biology and evolution 35(6): 1547–1549. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096
  • Macko P, Derka T, Čiamporová‐Zaťovičová Z, Grabowski M, Čiampor JrF (2024) Detailed DNA barcoding of mayflies in a small European country proved how far we are from having comprehensive barcode reference libraries. Molecular Ecology Resources, 24: e13954. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13954
  • Mittermeier RA, Turner WR, Larsen FW, Brooks TM, Gascon C (2011) Global biodiversity conservation: the critical role of hotspots. In: Zachos F, Habel JC (Eds) Biodiversity hotspots. Springer, Berlin, 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20992-5_1
  • Mumladze L, Japoshvili B, Anderson EP (2020) Faunal biodiversity research in the Republic of Georgia: A short review of trends, gaps, and needs in the Caucasus biodiversity hotspot. Biologia 75(9): 1385–1397. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-019-00398-6
  • Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853–845. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501
  • Nagy ZT, Sonet G, Glaw F, Vences M (2012) First large-scale DNA barcoding assessment of reptiles in the biodiversity hotspot of Madagascar, based on newly designed COI primers. Plos one 7(3): e34506. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034506
  • Najibzadeh M, Gharzi A, Rastegar-Pouyani N, Rastegar-Pouyani E, Pesarakloo A (2017) Habitat suitability for the Caucasian frog Rana macrocnemis Boulenger, 1885 (Amphibia: Anura: Ranidae). Russian Journal of Ecology 48: 280–286. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413617030122
  • Najibzadeh M, Ehl S, Feldmeier S, Pesarakloo A, Veith M (2021) Unequal sisters — Past and potential future range development of Anatolian and Hyrcanian brown frogs. Zoology 144: 125873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zool.2020.125873
  • Noss RF, Platt WJ, Sorrie BA, Weakley AS, Means DB, Costanza J, Peet RK (2015) How global biodiversity hotspots may go unrecognized: lessons from the North American Coastal Plain. Diversity and Distributions 21(2): 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12278
  • Polat P, Sunkar M (2017) The climatic characteristics of Rize and the trend analyses of long-term temperature and precipitation data around Rize. The Journal of International Social Sciences 27: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.18069/firatsbed.346684
  • Recuero E, Canestrelli D, Vörös J, Szabó K, Poyarkov NA, Arntzen JW, Crnobrnja-Isailovic J, Kidov AA, Cogălniceanu D, Caputo FP, Nascetti G, Martínez-Solano I (2012) Multilocus species tree analyses resolve the radiation of the widespread Bufo bufo species group (Anura, Bufonidae). Molecular phylogenetics and evolution 62(1): 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2011.09.008
  • Savolainen V, Cowan RS, Vogler AP, Roderick GK, Lane R (2005) Towards writing the encyclopaedia of life: an introduction to DNA barcoding. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 360(1462): 1805–1811. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1730
  • Vences M, Patmanidis S, Schmidt JC, Matschiner M, Miralles A, Renner SS (2024) Hapsolutely: a user-friendly tool integrating haplotype phasing, network construction, and haploweb calculation. Bioinformatics Advances 4(1): vbae083. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioadv/vbae083
  • Weigand H, Beermann AJ, Čiampor F, Costa FO, Csabai Z, Duarte S, Geiger MF, Grabowski M, Rimet F, Rulik B, Strand M, Szucsich N, Weigand AM, Willassen E, Wyler SA, Bouchez A, Borja A, Čiamporová-Zaťovičová Z, Ferreira S, Dijkstra KDB, Eisendle U, Freyhof J, Gadawski P, Graf W, Haegerbaeumer A, van der Hoorn BB, Japoshvili B, Keresztes L, Keskin E, Leese F, Macher JN, Mamos T, Paz G, Pešić V, Pfannkuchen DM, Pfannkuchen MA, Price BW, Rinkevich B, Teixeira MAL, Várbíró G, Ekrem T (2019) DNA barcode reference libraries for the monitoring of aquatic biota in Europe: Gap-analysis and recommendations for future work. Science of The Total Environment 678: 499–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.247
  • Zazanashvili N, Sanadiradze G, Bukhnikashvili A, Kandaurov A, Tarkhnishvili D (2004) Caucasus. In: Mittermeier RA, Gil PR, Hoffmann M, Pilgrim J, Brooks T, Mittermeier CG, Lamoreaux J, Da Fonseca GAB (Eds) Hotspots Revisited. Earth’s biologically richest and most endangered terrestrial ecoregions. Mexico City: CEMEX/Agrupacion Sierra Madre, 148–152.
login to comment