Research Article
Print
Research Article
A new Psammitis species (Araneae, Thomisidae) from an extinct volcano in Georgia with reevaluation of the generic position of Xysticus marmoratus Thorell, 1875
expand article infoArmen Seropian, Levan Mumladze
‡ Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia
Open Access

Abstract

A new species, Psammitis abuliensis sp. nov., from Didi Abuli Mt. (Georgia, Samtskhe-Javakheti region), is described based on two male specimens. Diagnostic drawings, measurements, collecting data, diagnosis, and DNA barcodes are given. A new combination, Psammitis marmoratus (Thorell, 1875), comb. nov. (ex. Xysticus), is proposed based on the COI subunit barcode results and morphological characters.

Key words

Arachnida, Caucasus, crab spider, description, diagnosis, new taxa, Samtskhe-Javakheti

Introduction

The long and complicated taxonomic history of Psammitis Menge, 1876, involves its separation from Xysticus C.L. Koch, 1835, and recognition as an independent genera (Menge 1876; Dalmas 1922; Ono 1978; Wunderlich 1987; Lehtinen 2002; Breitling 2019), alternatively with synonymizations with Xysticus (Simon 1895; Ono 1988). To date, 32 taxa (30 species and 2 subspecies) of Psammitis are known, mostly distributed in the Palaearctic Region (WSC 2023), characterized by different diameters of lateral eyes and palp with anapophysate disc-shaped flat tegulum at best having simple folds or sclerotized ridges. From the seven species reported from the Western Palaearctic (Nentwig et al. 2023), only two congeners – P. ninnii (Thorell, 1872) and P. sabulosus (Hahn, 1832) – are recorded in the Caucasus and Georgia (Otto 2023; WSC 2023).

In September 2018, two male specimens of an unknown Psammitis species were sampled by the second author on Didi Abuli Mt. – an extinct volcano and the highest peak in the Lesser Caucasus in Georgia, located in the Abul-Samsari Range. Herein the specimens are described as Psammitis abuliensis sp. nov., accompanied by photos of the holotype, paratype, and terra typica, diagnostic drawings, collecting details, diagnosis, barcoding results, and a discussion on the generic placement of Xysticus marmoratus Thorell, 1875, based on the phylogenetic analysis.

Materials and methods

The material for the present study was collected on September 12, 2018, during fieldwork in Javakheti Highland, at the peak of the mountain Didi Abuli, by hand under small stones. The collected material was preserved in 96% ethanol and stored in a freezer under -22˚C at the scientific collections of Ilia State University (ISU), Georgia, Tbilisi, for further DNA barcoding. Photos of the preserved specimens (Figs 1–3) were taken using a Canon EOS 60D camera with a Canon EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro USM and Raynox DCR-250 Super Macro Snap-On Lens and a Canon Macro Twin Lite MT-26EX-RT attached, and the whole set was mounted on a Novoflex Castel-L Focusing Rack. Digital images were prepared using Zerene Stacker image stacking software and Adobe Photoshop CS6 (version 13.0). Diagnostic drawings were made based on microscope photographs using a Wacom CTH-690 Intuos Medium Pen and Touch Tablet with the programs Krita (version 2.9.7) and Photoshop CS6 (version 13.0). All measurements are given in mm.

The following abbreviations are used in the text, tables, and figures: ALE (anterior lateral eyes), AME (anterior median eyes), d (dorsal), Et (embolus tip), Fe (femur), Mt (metatarsus), Pa (patella), p (prolateral), PLE (posterior lateral eyes), PME (posterior median eyes), r (retrolateral), Ta (tarsus), Ti (tibia), TuA (tutacular apophysis), v (ventral). Leg spination system according to Ono (1988). The prolateral femoral spines of leg I and ventral metatarsal spines of leg II are not paired, thus the number is indicated.

DNA processing

DNA extraction at the ZFMK (Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig) followed the standard protocols of the GBOL (German Barcode of Life) project (Geiger et al. 2016; http://www.bolgermany.de). DNA extraction at ISU was performed following the implemented protocol (Seropian et al. 2023a). Extracted DNA was deposited in the scientific collections of Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia, and aliquots will be deposited at The Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change (LIB) Biobank at Museum Koenig, Bonn, Germany, while the sequences have been submitted to Barcode of Life Data System (BOLD) databases (http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php). The newly obtained DNA barcodes of COI sequences were checked against the BOLD Systems database. The Barcode Index Numbers (BIN) (Ratnasingham and Hebert 2013) for the sequenced taxa and their nearest neighbor in BOLD Systems (if they had a BIN) are also given. For the calculation of sequence differentiation, we used p-distance as performed in the BOLD Systems.

In addition to the newly generated DNA barcodes, the published COI subunit barcodes of Psammitis spp. deposited in BOLD Systems and NCBI GenBank, along with a single barcode of P. ninnii originating from Georgia (obtained from the specimen collected within the CaBOL project), were included to evaluate relationships between Psammitis spp. based on uncorrected p-distance. As outgroups, COI barcodes obtained from the locally collected Xysticus spp., Spiracme spp., and Bassaniodes spp. were used (Table 1).

A Neighbor-Joining tree based on pairwise distances with 1000 bootstrap replicates was constructed with MEGA 11 software (Tamura et al. 2021) to visualize the phylogenetic relationships among specimens (Fig. 8).

Table 1.

List of the COI sequences used for molecular analyses.

Species Country of origin CaBOL-ID number BOLD/GenBank Acc. N.
Psammitis abuliensis sp. nov. Georgia 1012780 BOLD:AFP6894
Psammitis abuliensis sp. nov. Georgia 1012781 BOLD:AFP6894
Psammitis ninnii Georgia 1012634 BOLD:ACU8868
Spiracme striatipes Georgia 1023862 BOLD:AAD6911
Xysticus acerbus Georgia 1010349 BOLD:AAG1214
Xysticus marmoratus Georgia 1016820 BOLD:AAF8321
Bassaniodes pseudorectilineus * Georgia 1010063 BOLD:AAO1746
Psammitis deichmanni Canada BOLD:AAB7094
Psammitis labradorensis Canada BOLD:AAB1154
Psammitis rugosus Canada BOLD:AEO1986
Psammitis sabulosus Norway BOLD:ABU5838
Psammitis sabulosus Germany BOLD:ABU5838
Psammitis ninnii Spain MW998589.1

Results

Family Thomisidae Sundevall, 1833

Psammitis Menge, 1876

Type species

Thomisus sabulosus Hahn, 1832

Psammitis abuliensis sp. nov.

Figs 1–5

Type material

Holotype: ♂ (CaBOL-ID 1012781): Georgia: Samtskhe-Javakheti, Akhalkalaki municipality, Didi Abuli Mt.; N41.4380°, E43.6462°; 3267 m a.s.l., under rocks; 12 September 2018; leg. L. Mumladze. Paratype: 1♂ (CaBOL-ID 1012780): same collecting data. Both specimens are deposited in the scientific collections of Ilia State University, Georgia, Tbilisi.

Diagnosis

The new species resembles P. sabulosus (Hahn, 1832) that occurs in Georgia (Thaler 1981: figs 52, 57; Jantscher 2002: figs 5–6) and P. demirsoyi (Demir, Topçu & Türkes, 2006) from Turkey (Demir et al. 2006: figs 1–2, 5–7). The males of the new species can be distinguished from those of P. sabulosus by having a bow tie-shaped very short and broad embolus tip (vs. long and thin), a longer basal embolus, and a larger tutacular apophysis. From the males of P. demirsoyi, those of P. abuliensis sp. n. can be distinguished by the presence of a large tutacular apophysis (vs. absence) and a bow tie-shaped very short and broad embolus tip (vs. differently shaped longer and thinner) (Figs 3, 5).

Description

Male (holotype/paratype). Total length: 6.90/6.85; Carapace: 3.41/3.39 long, 3.35/3.35 wide; Abdomen: 3.80/3.85 long, 3.30/3.32 wide; Clypeal height: 0.35/0.34; Clypeus with 15 long and robust bristles; Cheliceral length: 1.15/1.15; AME: 0.11/0.11; ALE: 0.20/0.20; PME: 0.11/0.11; PLE: 0.14/0.14. Color and pattern as shown in Figs 4–5. Sternum yellow, with irregular dark spots. Leg coloration: Fe and Pa I–IV dark brown (Fe and Pa III–IV apically lightened), Ti, Mt, and Ta I–IV dark yellow (Ti I–II basally darkened). Leg measurements and spination as in Tables 2 and 3.

Female unknown.

Etymology. The specific epithet is an adjective referring to the type locality of the new species in Akhalkalaki municipality.

Habitat. Two males of the new species were obtained by hand collecting under the small stones on a mountaintop (Figs 6–7).

Distribution. Known from the type locality only.

Barcoding results. Two identical barcodes were obtained from the specimens with CaBOL-IDs 1012780 and 1012781 (BOLD:AFP6894) with the nearest neighbor in the BOLD Systems P. ninnii from Spain with a private status (p-distance 6.3%).

Figures 1–5. 

Psammitis abuliensis sp. nov., male (1 holotype, dorsal habitus 2 paratype, dorsal habitus 3 left palp, ventral view 4 ditto, retrolateral view 5 tip of embolus, rotated). Scale bars: 2 mm (1–2); 0.2 mm (3–4); 0.1 mm (5).

Table 2.

Length (mm) of leg segments. Male (holotype/paratype).

Fe Pa Ti Mt Ta Total
I 3.51/3.51 1.42/1.41 2.60/2.58 2.50/2.50 1.21/1.20 11.24/11.20
II 3.31/3.30 1.52/1.52 2.52/2.50 2.11/2.11 1.21/1.21 10.67/10.64
III 1.55/1.53 1.11/1.11 2.04/2.02 1.72/1.71 1.04/1.04 7.46/7.41
IV 2.25/2.22 1.02/0.98 2.11/2.09 1.80/1.80 1.02/1.02 8.20/8.11
Table 3.

Leg spination.

Fe Ti Mt
I d0-1-1-1-1 p11 p1-1-1 r1-1-1 p1-1-1-1-1ap r1-1-1-2ap
v2-1-2-2-2-1-2ap v1-1-2-1-1-1ap
II d1-1-2-1-1 p1-1-1 r1-1-1 p1-1-1-1ap r1-1-1ap
v2-1-1-1-1-1-1-2ap v11-2ap
III d0-1-1-1-1-1 p1-1-1ap r1-1-0 p1-1-1ap r1-1-1ap
v1-1-1-1-1-1 v2-2-2
IV d1-1-1 p1-1 r1-1 -1 p1-1-1ap r1-1-1ap
v1-1-1-1-2ap v1-1-1-1-2ap
Figures 6–7. 

Type locality of Psammitis abuliensis sp. nov. in Georgia, Didi Abuli Mt. (6 – sampling area; 7 – sampling plot).

Psammitis marmoratus (Thorell, 1875), comb. nov.

Xysticus marmoratus Mcheidze, 1997: 163, figs 305–306 (♂).

Xysticus embriki Hepner et al., 2011: 38, figs 5–10 (♂♀).

Note

For full nomenclatural references see WSC (2023).

Comments

This species is transferred to this genus due to the similarity of the male palp to the generotype, which possesses an anapophysate tegulum. As for the Psammitis spp. females, there seem to be no defined characters allowing reliable separation from Xysticus spp. The generic reevaluation is also supported by the phylogenetic tree generated within the preset study, which includes Xysticus marmoratus, a species not involved in a subset of the analyses performed by Breitling (2019), who supported the recognition of Psammitis as an independent genus. Our results suggest a close relationship between X. marmoratus and Psammitis spp. (Fig. 8); therefore, we propose a new combination, Psammitis marmoratus (Thorell, 1875), comb. nov. (= Xysticus marmoratus Thorell, 1875).

Discussion

Recent studies and collecting efforts in Georgia within the last half a decade have resulted in an additional 5 species of Thomisidae, of which one species is new to science (the herein-described Psammitis abuliensis sp. nov.) (Seropian et al. 2023a, b; present article). The herein reevaluation of P. marmoratus (ex. Xysticus) and the result of the research conducted by Breitling (2019) suggest a strong need for further revision of Xysticus spp. The exploration of remote, poorly studied, and hard-to-reach localities in Georgia could result in findings of more new species and redescriptions of very poorly defined three species endemic to the Caucasus region, namely X. caucasius L. Koch, 1878, X. charitonowi Mcheidze, 1971, and X. kalandadzei Mcheidze & Utotschkin, 1971, described by single females and known from single publication(s).

Figure 8. 

Phylogenetic relationships are presented by the Neighbor-Joining tree based on the mitochondrial COI barcode using the p-distance model with other default parameters provided by Mega 11. The analyses involved 13 COI nucleotide sequences of 10 thomisid species. Numbers indicate bootstrap support values from 1000 replicates.

Acknowledgements

AS is indebted to Nino Kachlishvili for performing the DNA extraction from the specimens. We are grateful to Nils Hein (subject editor), the anonymous reviewer, and Konrad Wiśniewski for providing constructive and valuable suggestions on the manuscript. The responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

The fieldwork of LM was supported by the Conchological Society of Great Britain & Ireland under the small research grant framework (https://conchsoc.org/pages/grants.php). DNA research was founded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research under grant number 01DK20014A.

Author contributions

AS made a morphological description of the specimens and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. LM Collected material and revised the final version of the manuscript.

Author ORCIDs

Armen Seropian https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3777-9954

Levan Mumladze https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2172-6973

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.

References

  • Breitling R (2019) A barcode-based phylogenetic scaffold for Xysticus and its relatives (Araneae: Thomisidae: Coriarachnini). Ecologica Montenegrina 20: 198—206. https://doi.org/10.37828/em.2019.20.16
  • Dalmas R (1922) Catalogue des araignées récoltées par le Marquis G. Doria dans l'ile Giglio (Archipel toscan). Annali del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Genova 50: 79–96.
  • Geiger MF, Astrin JJ, Borsch T, Burkhardt U, Grobe P, Hand R, Hausmann A, Hohberg K, Krogmann L, Lutz M, Monje C, Misof B, Morinière J, Müller K, Pietsch S, Quandt D, Rulik B, Scholler M, Traunspurger W, Haszprunar G, Wägele W (2016) How to tackle the molecular species inventory for an industrialized nation — lessons from the first phase of the German Barcode of Life initiative GBOL (2012–2015) 1. Genome 59(9): 661–670. https://doi.org/10.1139/gen-2015-0185
  • Jantscher E (2002) The significance of male pedipalpal characters for the higher systematics of the crab spider genus Xysticus C.L. Koch, 1835 (Araneae: Thomisidae). In: Toft S & Scharff N (eds.) European Arachnology 2000: Proceedings of the 19th European Colloquium of Arachnology. Aarhus University Press, pp. 329--336.
  • Lehtinen PT (2002) Generic revision of some thomisids related to Xysticus C. L. Koch, 1835 and Ozyptila Simon, 1864. In: Toft S, Scharff N (Eds) European Arachnology 2000: Proceedings of the 19th European Colloquium of Arachnology. Aarhus University Press, 315—327.
  • Menge A (1876) Preussische Spinnen. VIII. Fortsetzung. Schriften der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Danzig (NF) 3: 423—454.
  • Nentwig W, Bosmans R, Gloor D, Hänggi A, Kropf C (2023) Spiders of Europe. Version: 12.2022, Available from: https://www.araneae.nmbe.ch [Accessed: 31.12.2023]
  • Ono H (1978) Thomisidae aus dem Nepal-Himalaya. I. Das Genus Xysticus C.L. Koch 1835 (Arachnida: Araneae). Senckenbergiana Biologica 59: 267–288.
  • Ono H (1988) A revisional study of the spider family Thomisidae (Arachnida, Araneae) of Japan. National Science Museum, Tokyo, 252 pp.
  • Otto S (2023) Caucasian Spiders. A faunistic database on the spiders of the Caucasus. Version: 02.2022. https://caucasus-spiders.info/ [Accessed on 31.12.2023]
  • Seropian A, Otto S, Bulbulashvili N (2023) Picking pearls from the Silk Road: Insights into the spider (Arthropoda, Araneae) diversity in Georgia from the CaBOL project. Part I. Caucasiana 2: 143–159. https://doi.org/10.3897/caucasiana.2.e107049
  • Seropian A, Bulbulashvili N, Otto S, Krammer H-J, Kachlishvili N, Datunashvili A (2023) Picking pearls from the Silk Road: Insights into the spider (Arthropoda, Araneae) diversity in Georgia from the CaBOL project. Part II. Caucasiana 2: 231–297. https://doi.org/10.3897/caucasiana.2.e110536
  • Thaler K (1981) Bemerkenswerte Spinnenfunde in Nordtirol (Österreich). Veröffentlichungen des Museum Ferdinandeum in Innsbruck 61: 105–150.
  • Wunderlich J (1987) Die Spinnen der Kanarischen Inseln und Madeiras: Adaptive Radiation, Biogeographie, Revisionen und Neubeschreibungen. Triops, Langen, 435 pp.
login to comment