<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//TaxonX//DTD Taxonomic Treatment Publishing DTD v0 20100105//EN" "https://caucasiana.pensoft.net/nlm/tax-treatment-NS0.dtd">
<article xmlns:tp="http://www.plazi.org/taxpub" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">98</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="index">urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:3686FA2D-1003-5130-A1A9-6F0A4E63DF4D</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="aggregator">urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A3B9B45C-7F69-42DF-85B6-B3189A5B43F2</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title xml:lang="en">Caucasiana</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title xml:lang="en">Caucasiana</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2667-9809</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Pensoft Publishers</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3897/caucasiana.5.e207119</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">207119</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="biological_taxon">
          <subject>Plantae</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="scientific_subject">
          <subject>Biodiversity &amp; Conservation</subject>
          <subject>Ecology &amp; Environmental sciences</subject>
          <subject>Systematics</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="geological_era">
          <subject>Neogene</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Vegetation of Ski Pistes in the Lesser Caucasus (Bakuriani, Georgia): Species Composition, Functional Traits, and Temporal Dynamics</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group content-type="authors">
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Tedoradze</surname>
            <given-names>Giorgi</given-names>
          </name>
          <email xlink:type="simple">giorgi.tedoradze.2@iliauni.edu.ge</email>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8884-9177</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Bakhia</surname>
            <given-names>Arsena</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3809-1124</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Jugeli</surname>
            <given-names>Tamar</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Khuskivadze</surname>
            <given-names>Dimitri</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Megvinetukhutsesi</surname>
            <given-names>Nutsa</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Mikeladze</surname>
            <given-names>Giorgi</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4972-0562</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Rasran</surname>
            <given-names>Leonid</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0956-9354</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Sikharulidze</surname>
            <given-names>Shalva</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Kikvidze</surname>
            <given-names>Zaal</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5007-4484</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="A1">
        <label>1</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Niko Ketskhoveli Institute of Botany, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia</addr-line>
        <institution>Niko Ketskhoveli Institute of Botany, Ilia State University</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Tbilisi</addr-line>
        <country>Georgia</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/051qn8h41</uri>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A2">
        <label>2</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Institute of Botany, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna, Austria</addr-line>
        <institution>Institute of Botany, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU)</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Vienna</addr-line>
        <country>Austria</country>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A3">
        <label>3</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Institute of Ecology, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia</addr-line>
        <institution>Institute of Ecology, Ilia State University</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Tbilisi</addr-line>
        <country>Georgia</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/051qn8h41</uri>
      </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="corresp">
          <p>Corresponding author: Giorgi Tedoradze (<email xlink:type="simple">giorgi.tedoradze.2@iliauni.edu.ge)</email></p>
        </fn>
        <fn fn-type="edited-by">
          <p>Academic editor: George Fayvush</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>18</day>
        <month>09</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>5</volume>
      <fpage>147</fpage>
      <lpage>166</lpage>
      <uri content-type="arpha" xlink:href="http://openbiodiv.net/46986F53-0E9A-50EB-85A0-EF5F8B967E6C">46986F53-0E9A-50EB-85A0-EF5F8B967E6C</uri>
      <uri content-type="zoobank" xlink:href="https://zoobank.org/069CCE31-35B7-4416-877E-AD4182B66D9B">069CCE31-35B7-4416-877E-AD4182B66D9B</uri>
      <uri content-type="zenodo_dep_id" xlink:href="https://zenodo.org/record/22854528">22854528</uri>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>09</day>
          <month>07</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>22</day>
          <month>08</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Giorgi Tedoradze, Arsena Bakhia, Tamar Jugeli, Dimitri Khuskivadze, Nutsa Megvinetukhutsesi, Giorgi Mikeladze, Leonid Rasran, Shalva Sikharulidze, Zaal Kikvidze</copyright-statement>
        <license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple">
          <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="zoobank" xlink:type="simple">https://zoobank.org/069CCE31-35B7-4416-877E-AD4182B66D9B</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <label>Abstract</label>
        <p>Ski piste construction and maintenance are recognised as significant drivers of vegetation change in mountain ecosystems. The Caucasus has a rapidly developing ski tourism and at the same time is an important hotspot of global biodiversity; the impact of this form of land use on vegetation has not yet been studied in the area. We examined plant community structure, species composition and cover, functional-group biomass, and temporal dynamics along an elevation gradient (1,884–2,685 m a.s.l.) spanning montane to alpine zones at the Didveli ski piste within the Bakuriani ski resort (Lesser Caucasus, Georgia). We compared 36 ski piste plots (18 standard-track and 18 eroded) with 25 adjacent undisturbed control plots using ordination (PCA and CCA), cluster analysis, Indicator Species Analysis, and linear mixed-effects models. We analysed the occurrence of 103 species with a frequency ≥ 5 in these plots. PCA clearly separated control plots from disturbed plots along the axis associated with soil depth, species richness, and aboveground biomass. CCA confirmed that species distributions closely followed this human-impact gradient. Cluster analysis identified floristically distinct groups that broadly corresponded to control, track, and eroded conditions. Indicator Species Analysis revealed that undisturbed plots supported typical alpine meadow species (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Gentiana">Gentiana</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="septemfida">septemfida</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Bromus">Bromus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="variegatus">variegatus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Veratrum">Veratrum</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="lobelianum">lobelianum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>), while eroded plots were associated with disturbance-tolerant taxa (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Draba">Draba</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="hispida">hispida</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Arctium">Arctium</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="lappa">lappa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) and track plots with the compaction-tolerant grass <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Calamagrostis">Calamagrostis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="pseudophragmites">pseudophragmites</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Mean aboveground biomass on control plots (2,526 kg ha<sup>–1</sup>) was 2.1–3.0 times higher than on track (1,175 kg ha<sup>–1</sup>) and eroded plots (833 kg ha<sup>–1</sup>). Graminoids and forbs declined sharply under disturbance, whereas legume biomass was resilient across all land-use types, likely owing to nitrogen-fixation capacity. Temporal monitoring (2020–2023) showed stable or increasing biomass on control plots but limited and short-lived recovery on piste plots. These findings demonstrate that ski piste development substantially reduces biodiversity and productivity in the Caucasus Mountain grasslands and underlines the need for targeted restoration and sustainable management strategies.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <label>Key words:</label>
        <kwd>biomass</kwd>
        <kwd>disturbance</kwd>
        <kwd>mountain vegetation</kwd>
        <kwd>plant community</kwd>
        <kwd>phytosociology</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
    <notes>
      <sec sec-type="Citation" id="sec1">
        <title>Citation</title>
        <p>Tedoradze G, Bakhia A, Jugeli T, Khuskivadze D, Megvinetukhutsesi N, Mikeladze G, Rasran L, Sikharulidze S, Kikvidze Z (2026) Vegetation of Ski Pistes in the Lesser Caucasus (Bakuriani, Georgia): Species Composition, Functional Traits, and Temporal Dynamics. Caucasiana 5: 147–166. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3897/caucasiana.5.e207119" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3897/caucasiana.5.e207119</ext-link></p>
      </sec>
    </notes>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec sec-type="Introduction" id="sec2">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Ski tourism is one of the major economic activities in mountainous regions worldwide; its ecological footprint on high-altitude vegetation is considerable and extends well beyond the period of snow cover (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Rixen and Rolando 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Wipf et al. 2005</xref>). Piste construction involves grading and compaction of soils, removal of natural vegetation, and mechanical disturbance that can persist for decades; subsequent seasonal grooming further disrupts plant community structure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Hudek et al. 2020</xref>). The resulting changes include reduced plant cover, altered species composition, loss of soil organic matter, and shifts in plant functional-group dominance, all of which have long-term consequences for ecosystem functioning in fragile alpine and subalpine habitats (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Keller et al. 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Meijer zu Schlochtern et al. 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Wipf et al. 2005</xref>).</p>
      <p>The bulk of published research on skiing impacts has been conducted in the Alps (Italy, Switzerland, Austria, France) and, to a lesser extent, in other European mountains such as the Carpathians, Pyrenees, Apennines, Scandinavian ranges, and in North American mountains (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Klačanová et al. 2024</xref>). This geographic concentration is striking given that world-class ski resorts exist on every continent other than Antarctica, including Africa and Australia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Petterson 2005</xref>). The Caucasus, a mountainous region of globally recognised botanical importance and a setting of rapidly expanding ski tourism, has been entirely overlooked.</p>
      <p>The Caucasus is among the 36 recognised biodiversity hotspots in the world (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Habel et al. 2019</xref>). Its montane, subalpine, and alpine habitats contribute disproportionately to overall diversity through high species richness and endemism (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Körner 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Solomon et al. 2014</xref>), and are characteristically sensitive to environmental change (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Rixen and Rolando 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Wipf et al. 2005</xref>). Plant diversity in these systems underpins food security, water supply, medicinal resources, and traditional livelihoods, as well as providing soil stabilisation, wildlife habitat, and the aesthetic values that attract tourists (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Körner 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">EEA 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Győri 2020</xref>).</p>
      <p>Tourism is central to Georgia's economy. In 2025, the country received over 5.5 million international visitors, nearly twice its resident population (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Georgian National Tourism Administration 2026</xref>). Mountain and ski resorts recorded a 340% increase in visitor numbers between 2010 and 2017 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Mountain Resorts of Georgia 2017</xref>), and the National Tourism Strategic Plan explicitly provides for the expansion of ski piste infrastructure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">National Tourism Agency of Georgia 2015</xref>). Bakuriani, situated in the Lesser Caucasus, is among the most visited ski resorts in Georgia (Ski Resorts and Snow Reports 2026) and hosted the freestyle ski and snowboarding world championships in 2023, events that further intensify impacts on piste vegetation. The Bakuriani ski resort is located within the Borjomi Municipality, adjacent to the Borjomi-Kharagauli National Park, which represents one of the most extensively protected regions in the Caucasus. Furthermore, it is recognised as one of the most thoroughly documented floristic localities in Georgia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Javakhishvili 1956</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Nakhutsrishvili et al. 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Theissen et al. 2022</xref>). Nevertheless, no study has previously assessed the condition of vegetation on its ski pistes, nor on any piste in the South Caucasus.</p>
      <p>The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of ski piste construction and maintenance on vegetation at the Didveli piste complex (Bakuriani district, the Lesser Caucasus). Three specific questions were addressed: (i) How do ski pistes affect plant species composition, functional traits, and diversity compared to adjacent undisturbed habitats? (ii) How does the distribution of aboveground biomass among plant functional-groups differ between ski pistes and adjacent natural habitats? (iii) How do different piste conditions (standard track, eroded track, and undisturbed control) influence the spatiotemporal dynamics of plant functional-group biomass? To answer these questions, we analysed plant community structure along an elevation gradient from montane through subalpine to alpine zones using multivariate ordination, cluster analysis, indicator species analysis, and temporal monitoring of biomass.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="sec3">
      <title>Materials and methods</title>
      <sec sec-type="Study area" id="sec4">
        <title>Study area</title>
        <p>The research was conducted at the Bakuriani ski resort, located 183 km west of Tbilisi (<named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">41.75°N, 43.53°E</named-content>) on the slopes of the Lesser Caucasus, Georgia. The ski runs of the Didveli piste complex extend from 1,884 to 2,685 m a.s.l. across montane, subalpine, and alpine vegetation zones (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>).</p>
        <fig id="F1">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/caucasiana.5.e207119.figure1</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">6D75B4A1-CC70-5126-8A1A-0D563A26A1E9</object-id>
          <label>Figure 1.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Location of the Didveli ski pistes at Bakuriani, Georgia.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="caucasiana-05-147-g001.jpg" id="oo_1779611.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1779611</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>Alpine skiing has been practised on this mountain since 1932; prior to that, the terrain was used as summer pasture. The grazing season lasts three months in the summer, with shepherds typically transferring their livestock to the mountainous regions from late May until September (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">REC Caucasus 2019</xref>).</p>
        <p>The principal environmental pressures on soil and vegetation at present are grazing (cattle and sheep) (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref> A,B), summer trekking, and winter ski tourism, including artificial snow production and snow-grooming machinery that compacts the snowpack and shortens the vegetation period. Reconstruction works on the ski slopes, including the construction of water reservoirs (Suppl. material 1: fig. S1), constitute additional sources of environmental pressure.</p>
        <fig id="F2">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/caucasiana.5.e207119.figure2</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">795AC104-A841-50C8-B27F-4BDE667ADEE2</object-id>
          <label>Figure 2.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Grazing (A, B) and equipment operation (C, D) within the study area (Photo credit: G. Tedroadze).</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="caucasiana-05-147-g002.jpg" id="oo_1779612.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1779612</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>The climate is cool-temperate, with a mean annual temperature of 5.2°C and mean annual precipitation of 1,182 mm; monthly temperatures range from −6.5°C (January) to 16.8°C (August), and precipitation is concentrated from April to August (650 mm), with May being the wettest month (166 mm) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Fick and Hijmans 2017</xref>).</p>
        <p>The topography reflects Paleogenic folded structures. Brown forest soils dominate the montane and subalpine belts; under semi-natural pastures these degrade into meadow soils. At and above the tree line soils are diverse, including mountain meadow, mountain meadow peat, mountain meadow soddy, and mountain meadow soddy-peat (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Nakhutsrishvili et al. 2006</xref>).</p>
        <p>The vegetation zones include mixed conifer–broadleaved forests, broadly corresponding to four EUNIS (FloraVeg.EU, version 2025-10-03) habitat types: T35 – temperate continental <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Pinus">Pinus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="sylvestris">sylvestris</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> forest; T31 – temperate mountain <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Picea">Picea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> forest; T17 – <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Fagus">Fagus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> forest on non-acid soils; and T1C – temperate and boreal mountain <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Betula">Betula</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Populus">Populus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="tremula">tremula</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> forest on mineral soils. These forests are characterised by <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Pinus">Pinus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="sylvestris">sylvestris</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> var. <italic>hamata</italic> Steven, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Fagus">Fagus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="orientalis">orientalis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Lipsky, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Picea">Picea</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="orientalis">orientalis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (L.) Peterm., and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Betula">Betula</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="pubescens">pubescens</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> var. <italic>litwinowii</italic> (Doluch.) Ashburner &amp; McAll. Shrublands of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Rhododendron">Rhododendron</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="caucasicum">caucasicum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Pall. and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Vaccinium">Vaccinium</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> spp. align with EUNIS S22 – alpine and subalpine ericoid heath. Subalpine and alpine pastures are analogous to EUNIS R4 ­– alpine and subalpine grasslands, with subalpine vegetation characterised by <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Aconitum">Aconitum</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="orientale">orientale</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Mill., <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Cephalaria">Cephalaria</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="gigantea">gigantea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Ledeb.) Bobrov, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Betonica">Betonica</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="macrantha">macrantha</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> K.Koch, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Lomelosia">Lomelosia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="caucasica">caucasica</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (M.Bieb.) Greuter &amp; Burdet, and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Festuca">Festuca</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="varia">varia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Haenke, and alpine vegetation typified by <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Festuca">Festuca</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="ovina">ovina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> L., <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ranunculus">Ranunculus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="breyninus">breyninus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Crantz, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Alchemilla">Alchemilla</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="erythropoda">erythropoda</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Juz., and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Sibbaldia">Sibbaldia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="parviflora">parviflora</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Willd. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Nakhutsrishvili et al. 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Chytrý et al. 2024</xref>).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Vegetation and soil sampling" id="sec5">
        <title>Vegetation and soil sampling</title>
        <p>Field sampling was carried out on the Didveli ski piste, which remained accessible by cable car throughout the summer. Phytosociological plots were established within the ski run and paired with control plots in adjacent, undisturbed pasture (within 50–100 m of the piste boundary). Slope angles ranged from 10° to 45° between 1,887 and 2,664 m a.s.l. Sampling was performed during the active growing season following the methods of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Braun-Blanquet (1964)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">van der Maarel (2007)</xref>, using the modified Braun-Blanquet scale (r, +, 1, 2m, 2a, 2b, 3, 4, 5) to estimate species cover.</p>
        <p>The study area was divided into three altitudinal sections: (1) the highest section (Panorama piste), corresponding to the alpine zone; (2) intermediate slopes (Deka and Slalom pistes), corresponding to the subalpine zone; and (3) lower slopes (comprising Didveli 1, 2, 3, and Nodo), corresponding to upper mountainous zone (Suppl. material 1: fig. S2.). A further difference of the lower sites to the two other zones, was that all of them received artificial snow. Two parallel transects were established: one within the piste, and one immediately adjacent but outside it. Where pistes were crossed by maintenance roads, evident erosion led to the creation of a third, eroded category.</p>
        <p>The main vegetation types within the sampled area were broadly classified according to the revised EUNIS Habitat Classification (version 2025-10-03; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Chytrý et al. 2024</xref>), based on observed vegetation characteristics and floristic composition. Alpine and subalpine grasslands broadly correspond to EUNIS R4, whereas eroded and drainage-influenced areas were treated as open and disturbed vegetation types rather than assigned to a specific EUNIS habitat category.</p>
        <p>In total, 62 plots were sampled: 26 control plots, 18 track plots (piste without additional disturbance), and 18 eroded plots (piste with additional disturbance from maintenance vehicles) (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3A-C</xref>). One control plot at 2,599 m a.s.l. was identified as a compositionally distinct outlier during preliminary exploratory analyses. This plot was strongly dominated by <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Rhododendron">Rhododendron</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="caucasicum">caucasicum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, with only two additional species occurring at very low cover, and it was therefore excluded from subsequent analyses, leaving 61 plots in all.</p>
        <fig id="F3">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/caucasiana.5.e207119.figure3</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">2B9CDB14-C4AF-53D2-9519-F8CC1BF087EA</object-id>
          <label>Figure 3.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Three categories of sampled plots: (A) control, (B) track and (C) eroded plots (Photo credit: G. Tedroadze).</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="caucasiana-05-147-g003.jpg" id="oo_1779613.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1779613</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>Soil conditions were characterised by two variables: bare soil surface (%, assessed visually) and soil depth (cm, measured with a 40 cm auger). Plant species were identified using the multi-volume Key to Plants of Georgia and ’Flora of Georgia’ (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Ketskhoveli et al. 1964</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">1969</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Ketskhoveli et al. 1971-2011</xref>). Specimens of uncertain identity were collected, dried, and deposited at the herbarium of the Botanical Institute of Ilia State University (TBI) for later identification. Nomenclature follows the Flora of Georgia checklist (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Davlianidze et al. 2018</xref>) harmonised with international databases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">GBIF 2026</xref>).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Aboveground biomass" id="sec6">
        <title>Aboveground biomass</title>
        <p>Aboveground biomass (<abbrev xlink:title="Aboveground biomass">AGB</abbrev>) was harvested during the summers of 2020, 2021, and 2023, at the end of July when biomass reaches its seasonal peak. Within each 25 m² phytosociological plot, a 0.1 m² frame was placed at four random positions and all above ground plant material clipped at ground level, yielding a total harvested area of 0.4m² per plot (Suppl. material 1: fig. S3). Biomass per square metre was calculated by multiplying the harvested mass by 2.5.</p>
        <p>Harvested material was sorted into three functional groups: graminoids (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Poaceae">Poaceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Cyperaceae">Cyperaceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> and <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Juncaceae">Juncaceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), legumes (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Fabaceae">Fabaceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), and forbs (all remaining families). Material was sun-dried in sealed bags for one month at 25–38°C and weighed on a precision balance. A moisture-correction procedure was applied following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Scurlock et al. (2002)</xref>: a subsample from each collection was oven-dried at 70°C to constant mass, and the ratio of oven-dry to sun-dry mass was used as a correction factor to express all biomass values on an oven-dry basis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Perez-Harguindeguy et al. 2016</xref>).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Statistical analyses" id="sec7">
        <title>Statistical analyses</title>
        <p>Relationships among environmental variables (elevation, slope angle, bare soil surface, soil depth) and aggregate vegetation characteristics (species richness, <abbrev xlink:title="Aboveground biomass">AGB</abbrev>) were first explored with Principal Component Analysis (PCA) in 'between-group' mode, using Pearson's correlation coefficient and grouping plots as Control, Track, or Eroded. The resulting PCA components served as composite independent variables in a subsequent Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity. PCA and CCA were performed in PAST 5 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Hammer et al. 2001</xref>). Significance of CCA axes was assessed by 999-permutation test.</p>
        <p>Species distributions were further examined with hierarchical cluster analysis. Pairwise Jaccard distances were computed from a presence–absence matrix and plots clustered using Ward's minimum-variance linkage, implemented in PC-ORD 5.0 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">McCune and Mefford 2006</xref>). The dendrogram was divided into four clusters. The relationship between cluster membership and plot categories (Control, Track, and Eroded) was tested with a Pearson chi-square test and a Monte Carlo <italic>p</italic>-value based on 2,000 replicates (<italic>χ</italic>²=21.1, <italic>p</italic>=0.0005). Clusters were interpreted based on species composition and ecological traits.</p>
        <p>Indicator Species Analysis (ISA) was performed with the R package indicspecies (De Cáceres t al. 2010; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">R Core Team 2025</xref>) (multipart function, IndVal.g association measure, 999 permutations) to identify species characteristic of each plot category. Of the 211 species recorded, 156 were retained for ISA after removing singletons and invariant taxa. Species with IndVal≥0.6 and <italic>p</italic>≤0.05 were considered strong indicators; species with IndVal≥0.4 and <italic>p</italic>≤0.05 are reported as moderate indicators. These thresholds were established based on prior applications of Indicator Species Analysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Danielsen et al. 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Lasram et al. 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Wu and Pinzon 2022</xref>) and served as pragmatic criteria rather than as a universal standard.</p>
        <p>The impact of skiing on functional-group biomass was assessed with a further PCA (PAST 5). Year-to-year variation in functional-group biomass was tested with linear mixed-effects models (R package nlme; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Pinheiro and Bates 2022</xref>), with year and land-use type as fixed effects and plot as a random effect.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Results" id="sec8">
      <title>Results</title>
      <sec sec-type="Environmental conditions and aggregate vegetation characteristics" id="sec9">
        <title>Environmental conditions and aggregate vegetation characteristics</title>
        <p>Sampling yielded three plot subsets: Control (plots adjacent to but outside pistes), Track (piste plots without additional disturbance beyond skiing) and Eroded (piste plots additionally disturbed by maintenance vehicles). In total, 211 species were recorded; 103 species occurring in at least five plots were retained for multivariate analyses (Suppl. material 2: table SS1).</p>
        <p>The between-group PCA produced two components with eigenvalues &gt;1 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>). PC1 (eigenvalue 4.01) explained 66.91% of variation and was strongly associated with Bare Soil Surface (negatively) and Soil Depth, Species Richness, and <abbrev xlink:title="Aboveground biomass">AGB</abbrev> (positively); it therefore represents a gradient of human impact intensity. PC2 (eigenvalue 1.99) explained the remaining 33.09% and was dominated by Elevation and Slope Angle, representing natural environmental variation (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>).</p>
        <fig id="F4">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/caucasiana.5.e207119.figure4</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">220C1747-E910-5806-8E01-D9346668C6E0</object-id>
          <label>Figure 4.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>PCA biplot of environmental variables (Elevation, Slope, Bare Soil Surface, Soil Depth) and aggregate vegetation characteristics (species richness, aboveground biomass). Plots are grouped as Control, Track, and Eroded (centroids in red). Ellipses show 95% confidence intervals. PC1 and PC2 explained 66.91% and 33.09% of the total variance, respectively.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="caucasiana-05-147-g004.jpg" id="oo_1779614.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1779614</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <table-wrap id="T1" position="float" orientation="portrait">
          <label>Table 1.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Correlation matrix of environmental and vegetation variables. Only statistically significant values are shown (p &lt; 0.05). Elevation (m a.s.l.); Slope Angle (°); Bare Soil Surface (%); Soil Depth (cm); Species Richness; Aboveground Biomass (<abbrev xlink:title="Aboveground biomass">AGB</abbrev>).</p>
          </caption>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Variables</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Elevation</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Slope angle</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Bare soil</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Soil depth</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Species richness</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>
                    <abbrev xlink:title="Aboveground biomass">AGB</abbrev>
                  </bold>
                </th>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Elevation</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Slope angle</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.72</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Bare soil</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Soil depth</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">−0.33</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Species richness</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">−0.51</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.55</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="Aboveground biomass">AGB</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">−0.29</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">−0.40</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.46</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.63</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">PC 1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">−0.74</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.76</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.83</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.72</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">PC 2</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.88</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.86</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">−0.31</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">−0.50</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>Track and Eroded plot centroids were closely associated with Bare Soil Surface, while the Control centroid was strongly associated with Soil Depth, Species Richness, and <abbrev xlink:title="Aboveground biomass">AGB</abbrev>. Although Track and Eroded plots overlapped considerably, both were clearly separated from Control plots, especially along PC1.</p>
        <p>Consistent with this pattern, Control plots had substantially higher vegetation cover (mean 85%; maximum height 68 cm) and greater aboveground biomass than piste plots (Track and Eroded combined: mean cover 45%; maximum height 44 cm; minimum cover occasionally as low as 15%).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Species distributions on environmental and impact gradients" id="sec10">
        <title>Species distributions on environmental and impact gradients</title>
        <p>The CCA using PCA components as composite environmental variables was highly significant for both axes (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001, 999 permutations; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>; Suppl. material 1: fig. S4). CCA Axis 1 (68.62% of variation) separated Control plots from Track and Eroded plots, with the Control centroid associated with PC1 (impact-intensity proxy). CCA Axis 2 (31.38%) reflected natural environmental variation (PC2). The overall pattern of species distribution thus mirrored that of the environmental PCA: a dominant axis of human impact separating undisturbed from disturbed plots, and a secondary axis of elevational and topographic variation.</p>
        <fig id="F5">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/caucasiana.5.e207119.figure5</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">0BDBBA8A-A9DB-552A-8F80-276FA4230D6E</object-id>
          <label>Figure 5.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>CCA triplot showing composite environmental variables (PC1, PC2 from PCA) and species distribution across plots grouped as Control, Track, and Eroded (centroids in red). Ordination based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity. Ellipses show 95% confidence intervals. CCA Axis 1 and Axis 2 explained 68.62% and 31.38% of the constrained variation, respectively.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="caucasiana-05-147-g005.jpg" id="oo_1779615.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1779615</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Cluster analysis" id="sec11">
        <title>Cluster analysis</title>
        <p>Cluster analysis identified four floristically distinct groups (Suppl. material 1: fig. S5). Chaining was low (2.02%), and cluster membership was significantly associated with plot category (Control, Track, and Eroded; <italic>χ</italic>² = 21.10, simulated p = 0.0005), indicating that the identified floristic groups were strongly related to the disturbance categories.</p>
        <p>Cluster 1 mainly included Control plots (13 of 18 plots, 72%), representing undisturbed habitats. Cluster 2 contained predominantly Eroded (11 plots) and Track (10 plots) plots, reflecting moderate-to-high disturbance without a clear separation of erosion from track effects. Cluster 3 was compositionally heterogeneous (9 Control, 4 Eroded, 4 Track plots), corresponding to transitional communities at higher elevations where harsh abiotic conditions exert a strong compositional filter. Cluster 4 was small and predominantly Control-associated (3 Control, 1 Eroded, 1 Track). Together, the clusters confirmed that disturbance is a primary determinant of compositional differentiation, with a secondary contribution from natural environmental variation at high elevations.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Indicator Species Analysis" id="sec12">
        <title>Indicator Species Analysis</title>
        <p>ISA was performed on the three plot categories (Control, Track, Eroded), combining Track and Eroded given their strong ordination overlap. The analysis identified clear floristic differences between undisturbed and disturbed plots (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>).</p>
        <table-wrap id="T2" position="float" orientation="portrait">
          <label>Table 2.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Top indicator species per plot category based on IndVal (≥ 0.4) and p ≤ 0.05. Species names are in italics.</p>
          </caption>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Plot category</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Species</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>IndVal</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>p-value</bold>
                </th>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Control</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Gentiana">Gentiana</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="septemfida">septemfida</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.683</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.007</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Control</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Bromus">Bromus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="variegatus">variegatus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.670</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.003</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Control</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Veratrum">Veratrum</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="lobelianum">lobelianum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.636</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.007</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Control</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Bistorta">Bistorta</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="carnea">carnea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.628</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.002</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Control</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Silene">Silene</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="saxatilis">saxatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.585</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.003</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Eroded</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Draba">Draba</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="hispida">hispida</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.451</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.027</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Eroded</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Arctium">Arctium</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="lappa">lappa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.427</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.045</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Track</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Calamagrostis">Calamagrostis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="pseudophragmites">pseudophragmites</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.430</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.037</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Control + Track</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Rhinanthus">Rhinanthus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="major">major</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> var. apterus</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.722</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.004</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Control + Track</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Anthoxanthum">Anthoxanthum</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="odoratum">odoratum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.690</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.002</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>Control plots were characterised by <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Gentiana">Gentiana</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="septemfida">septemfida</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (IndVal 0.683), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Bromus">Bromus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="variegatus">variegatus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (0.670), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Veratrum">Veratrum</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="lobelianum">lobelianum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (0.636), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Bistorta">Bistorta</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="carnea">carnea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (0.628), and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Silene">Silene</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="saxatilis">saxatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (0.585). Eroded plots were associated with <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Draba">Draba</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="hispida">hispida</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (IndVal 0.451) and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Arctium">Arctium</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="lappa">lappa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (0.427), whereas Track plots were characterised by <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Calamagrostis">Calamagrostis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="pseudophragmites">pseudophragmites</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (IndVal 0.430). Two species — <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Rhinanthus">Rhinanthus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="major">major</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> var. <italic>apterus</italic> (IndVal 0.722) and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Anthoxanthum">Anthoxanthum</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="odoratum">odoratum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (0.690) — were identified as indicators shared between Control and Track plots.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Spatial and temporal dynamics of plant functional-group biomass" id="sec13">
        <title>Spatial and temporal dynamics of plant functional-group biomass</title>
        <p>The PCA of functional-group biomasses identified two components (eigenvalues 3.7 and 1.3, explaining 74.1% and 25.9% of variation, respectively; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6</xref>; Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>). PC1 was positively associated with Soil Depth and the biomasses of all three functional groups (especially Graminoids), indicating that deeper soils support overall higher productivity. PC2 was determined by the factor Elevation, with Legume biomass correlating negatively with Elevation, indicating that legumes grow better at lower altitudes regardless of disturbance. Graminoids and forbs were particularly sensitive to reductions in Soil Depth associated with disturbance.</p>
        <fig id="F6">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/caucasiana.5.e207119.figure6</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">1E27199F-E0DD-5A60-A322-5CD86EB28DA3</object-id>
          <label>Figure 6.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>PCA biplot of graminoid, forb, and legume aboveground biomass in relation to elevation and soil depth across Control, Track, and Eroded plots. PC1 and PC2 explained 74.1% and 25.9% of the total variance, respectively.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="caucasiana-05-147-g006.jpg" id="oo_1779616.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1779616</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <table-wrap id="T3" position="float" orientation="portrait">
          <label>Table 3.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Correlation matrix of Elevation (m a.s.l.), Soil Depth (cm), and the aboveground biomasses of graminoids, legumes, and forbs. Only significant values are shown (p &lt; 0.05).</p>
          </caption>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Variables</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Elevation</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Soil depth</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Graminoids</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Legumes</bold>
                </th>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Elevation</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Soil depth</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Graminoids</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">−0.48</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.43</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Legumes</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">−0.57</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.39</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Forbs</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.50</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.53</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">PC 1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">−0.34</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.73</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.82</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.57</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">PC 2</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.94</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.26</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">−0.32</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">−0.74</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>Overall, graminoid biomass on Control plots was 2.5 times higher than on Track plots and 3.5 times higher than on Eroded plots. Forb biomass on Control plots was three times higher than on Track and four times higher than on Eroded plots. Mean <abbrev xlink:title="Aboveground biomass">AGB</abbrev> was highest on Control plots (2,526 kg ha<sup>–1</sup>), intermediate on Track plots (1,175 kg ha<sup>–1</sup>), and lowest on Eroded plots (833 kg ha<sup>–1</sup>).</p>
        <p>Forb and graminoid biomasses differed significantly among land-use types (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001) and were consistently lower on both Track and Eroded pistes than on Control plots (all pairwise <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7</xref>). In Control plots, forb biomass increased significantly between 2020 and 2021 (<italic>p</italic> = 0.0019), likely reflecting natural inter-annual variation. Eroded plots showed no significant temporal changes (<italic>p</italic> &gt; 0.3), indicating persistent environmental stress and limited recovery capacity. Track plots exhibited a modest increase in graminoid biomass between 2020 and 2021 (<italic>p</italic> = 0.044) that did not persist into 2023.</p>
        <fig id="F7">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/caucasiana.5.e207119.figure7</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">5756A553-591D-5C97-930E-8907BF30BF1A</object-id>
          <label>Figure 7.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Year-to-year dynamics (2020, 2021, 2023) of aboveground biomass (g m-²) for graminoids, legumes, and forbs across Control (Reference Area), Track (Piste), and Eroded (Eroded Piste) plots. Points are means ± SE.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="caucasiana-05-147-g007.jpg" id="oo_1779617.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1779617</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>Legume biomass showed a different pattern: it did not differ significantly among land-use types (<italic>p</italic> = 0.515) but increased strongly over time across all categories (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001), suggesting high resilience to disturbance and possibly benefiting from nitrogen-poor soils where competition is reduced.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Discussion" id="sec14">
      <title>Discussion</title>
      <sec sec-type="Ski piste impacts on plant communities" id="sec15">
        <title>Ski piste impacts on plant communities</title>
        <p>Our results demonstrate that disturbance due to construction (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>. C-D) and use of ski pistes substantially alters plant community structure in the Caucasus Mountain vegetation. Control plots maintained higher species richness and aboveground biomass, representing traditional semi-natural meadow communities typical of the region's long history of pastoral land use. Eroded plots had the lowest species richness and biomass, reflecting the compounded effects of soil loss, microhabitat disruption, and reduced capacity for species establishment. Track plots showed intermediate values, with both mechanical disturbance from skiing and colonisation by opportunistic taxa.</p>
        <p>The clear separation of Control from piste plots in ordination space, combined with substantial overlap between Track and Eroded plots, mirrors patterns described in European ski areas (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Wipf et al. 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Klačanová et al. 2024</xref>). The overlap between Control and Track plots at high elevations is consistent with the dominance of disturbance-tolerant alpine tussock species across both disturbed and undisturbed sites at extreme elevations, as documented elsewhere in the Alps and Carpathians (Körner 2003; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Klačanová et al. 2024</xref>). The overall reduction in vegetation cover from a mean of 85% on Control plots to 45% on piste plots — and the halving of maximum herbaceous layer height confirm that mechanical and chemical impacts of piste construction and maintenance exceed the natural resilience capacity of these grassland communities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Roux-Fouillet et al. 2011</xref>).</p>
        <p>Apparently there is an interaction between elevation and impact following use as ski pistes. At higher altitudes, control and track plots exhibit greater similarity compared with lower altitudes (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>). This phenomenon may be attributed to the extensive use of artificial snowmaking at lower elevations, which consequently reduces the growing season. The outcome is a decline in species diversity and biomass.</p>
        <p>Biomass on Control plots was 2.1 – 3.0 times higher than on disturbed plots, a ratio broadly consistent with findings from alpine ski areas in the Alps and Pyrenees (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Meijer zu Schlochtern et al. 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Barrantes et al. 2013</xref>). The strong correlation of biomass with soil depth underlines the central role of soil integrity in sustaining mountain grassland productivity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Pintaldi et al. 2017</xref>).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Indicator species and ecological interpretation" id="sec16">
        <title>Indicator species and ecological interpretation</title>
        <p>The indicator species clearly distinguished undisturbed from disturbed vegetation. Control plots were dominated by characteristic alpine meadow species — <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Gentiana">Gentiana</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="septemfida">septemfida</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Bromus">Bromus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="variegatus">variegatus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Bistorta">Bistorta</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="carnea">carnea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Silene">Silene</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="saxatilis">saxatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Veratrum">Veratrum</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="lobelianum">lobelianum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> — whose presence reflects intact soil conditions and absence of heavy mechanical disturbance. The abundance of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Veratrum">Veratrum</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="lobelianum">lobelianum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, a species favoured by long-term overgrazing in the Caucasus (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Callaway et al. 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Tedoradze 2022</xref>), is also consistent with the centuries-long pastoral history of the area.</p>
        <p>Eroded plots were characterised by <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Draba">Draba</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="hispida">hispida</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Arctium">Arctium</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="lappa">lappa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, both tolerant of, or associated with, disturbed and eroded substrates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Guna 2019</xref>). Track plots were most strongly associated with <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Calamagrostis">Calamagrostis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="pseudophragmites">pseudophragmites</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, which thrives in compacted soils and along drainage channels that form on flat sections of piste (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Skokanová et al. 2015</xref>). The occurrence of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Rhinanthus">Rhinanthus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="major">major</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> var. <italic>apterus</italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Anthoxanthum">Anthoxanthum</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="odoratum">odoratum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> as shared indicators of Control and Track plots suggests that moderate piste disturbance does not eliminate all meadow-adapted species; both are broad-habitat species of traditionally managed mountain grasslands. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Rhinanthus">Rhinanthus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="major">major</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> var. <italic>apterus</italic> is a summer annual species and is therefore less affected by mechanical stress during winter, while additional vegetation gaps created by disturbance may facilitate its seed germination (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Lawniczak et al. 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Akhalkatsi and Tarkhnishvili 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Tedoradze et al. 2020</xref>).</p>
        <p>Cluster analysis revealed a continuum of compositional change rather than a sharp boundary between disturbance states. The partial merging of Control and Track clusters at high elevations, where severe abiotic conditions override land-use effects, is characteristic of alpine ecosystems globally (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Sundqvist et al. 2013</xref>). These mosaics reflect the gradual nature of ecological responses to skiing disturbance and the difficulty of establishing unambiguous reference conditions in landscapes shaped by thousands of years of pastoral management (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Kikvidze 2020</xref>).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Plant functional types and biomass dynamics" id="sec17">
        <title>Plant functional types and biomass dynamics</title>
        <p>The differential responses of functional groups to disturbance provide insight into underlying mechanisms. The sharp decline of graminoid and forb biomass on disturbed plots reflects their sensitivity to soil compaction, nutrient loss, erosion, and disruption of belowground biomass by grooming machinery. Alpine forbs are characteristically slow-growing with limited regenerative capacity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Myerburg et al. 2011</xref>), and although graminoids are generally considered more tolerant of disturbance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Cole and Monz 2002</xref>), the degree of impact on ski pistes — particularly on eroded sections — clearly exceeds the resilience threshold of these communities.</p>
        <p>The resilience of legumes is a notable finding. Legume biomass was statistically indistinguishable among land-use types and increased across all categories over the three-year monitoring period, consistent with their ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen and their competitive advantage in nutrient-poor soils (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Vitousek et al. 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Olsen et al. 2013</xref>). Nitrogen limitation is a prominent feature of high-altitude soils (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Barberis et al. 2023</xref>), and legumes are frequently among the first colonisers of degraded or disturbed alpine substrates. The elevated legume biomass on piste plots could also partly reflect deliberate sowing of legumes during piste restoration, as is practiced in some European ski areas. In contrast to our findings, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Barrantes et al. (2013)</xref> reported reduced legume cover on Pyrenean ski pistes, which they attributed to very intense mechanical disturbance exceeding the tolerance even of this resilient functional group. The limiting factors for legumes may include the levels of phosphorus in the soil, as indicated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Ren et al. (2017)</xref>. Furthermore, these factors — mechanical disturbance and the soil nutrient content — are interdependent.</p>
        <p>Temporal dynamics further highlighted the limited recovery capacity of disturbed piste vegetation. The significant increase in forb biomass on Control plots between 2020 (62.4 mm) and 2021 (85.1 mm) most likely reflects natural inter-annual variability (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7</xref>). The absence of any significant change on Eroded plots over the study period indicates ongoing environmental stress. The short-lived graminoid increase on Track plots in 2021 suggests that brief episodes of partial recovery can occur but are insufficient for sustained restoration, consistent with the multi-year recovery trajectories documented in experimental ski piste restoration studies in the Alps (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Wipf et al. 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Roux-Fouillet et al. 2011</xref>).</p>
        <p>Grazing, which takes place on and adjacent to the ski pistes throughout summer, likely interacts synergistically with skiing impacts: piste vegetation already weakened by soil compaction and erosion is particularly vulnerable to herbivory and trampling by livestock (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Mayer et al. 2009</xref>). This combination of pressures may further delay recovery and promote the dominance of disturbance-tolerant and grazing-resistant species.</p>
        <p>This study has several limitations and methodological challenges that should be considered when interpreting the results. First, although control plots were situated 50–100 m from the piste boundary, a distance similar to or greater than that used in previous studies of ski-piste vegetation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Wipf et al. 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Roux-Fouillet et al. 2011</xref>), potential indirect effects extending beyond the piste boundary cannot be completely excluded. Moreover, the spatial extent of such effects may vary depending on local topography and habitat type. For example, disturbance effects may propagate differently across open grasslands than in areas where ski runs cross or border forest belts, where vegetation structure, slope configuration, and hydrological connectivity may influence the extent of impact. Future studies should therefore incorporate multiple control distances and spatial scales while accounting for topographic and habitat differences to better characterise the spatial extent of ski-piste impacts.</p>
        <p>The temporal scope of the study represents a further limitation. Although vegetation cover and species composition were documented during all monitoring years, including 2022, biomass was not measured in that year. In addition, the relatively short monitoring period limits our ability to distinguish persistent vegetation recovery trends from interannual climatic variability and other ecological fluctuations. Consequently, the temporal patterns observed in this study should be interpreted as short-term responses rather than conclusive evidence of long-term recovery trajectories. Longer-term monitoring, ideally incorporating repeated assessments of vegetation composition, cover, and biomass, would provide a stronger basis for evaluating the persistence and stability of vegetation recovery under ski piste management.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Conclusions" id="sec18">
        <title>Conclusions</title>
        <p>This study provides the first assessment of ski piste impacts on vegetation in the Caucasus, filling a geographic gap in the literature on mountain tourism ecology. Our results demonstrate that a clear gradient of impact intensity exists from undisturbed adjacent pastures through standard piste tracks to heavily eroded piste sections. Ski piste construction and maintenance significantly reduced species diversity, aboveground biomass, vegetation cover, and structural complexity in montane, subalpine, and alpine vegetation, with the strongest effects on eroded piste sections. Plant functional groups responded differentially to disturbance: graminoids and forbs declined sharply, while legumes showed resilience across all conditions, likely owing to their nitrogen-fixation capacity. Grazing, occurring on and near the ski slopes throughout the summer, likely interacts synergistically with the impacts of skiing. Under the existing land-use conditions, temporal monitoring suggests relatively slow and limited vegetation recovery on disturbed piste plots during the period examined, although longer-term monitoring is needed to determine whether these patterns persist over time.</p>
        <p>The semi-natural grasslands of the Caucasus represent a unique cultural and ecological heritage: they have been shaped by thousands of years of pastoral management (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Kikvidze 2020</xref>), support exceptional plant diversity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Wiesmair et al. 2017</xref>), and form a distinctive element of the Caucasian mountain landscape (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Elizbarashvili et al. 2021</xref>). The ongoing expansion of ski tourism in Georgia therefore requires careful ecological assessment and adaptive management. We recommend that future piste development minimise soil disturbance, prioritise ecological restoration of eroded sections using locally sourced seed mixtures and incorporate long-term vegetation monitoring as a standard component of ski resort management. Furthermore, it is imperative to continue with and broaden research endeavours across diverse ski slopes and resorts within Georgia to evaluate spatial and ecosystem-level variations in ecological impacts. This includes identifying vulnerable habitats and formulating management strategies tailored to local conditions. Such scholarly efforts will enhance comprehension of degradation processes and facilitate the development of effective restoration interventions. These measures are essential for reconciling the economic importance of ski tourism with the conservation of the Caucasus mountain biodiversity.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ack>
      <title>Acknowledgments</title>
      <p>This article is dedicated to our late colleague, Prof. Dr. Giorgi (Gia) Nakhutsrishvili. We will deeply miss his brilliant mind, passion for discovery, and friendship. We sincerely thank Nana Khetsuriani for her assistance in selecting sampling plots on the ski slopes. We also appreciate our colleagues Tamar Zangurashvili and Lia Jinjolia for their involvement in biomass separation in Tbilisi. Our gratitude extends to young individuals Vera and Mariam Bakhia for their contribution to separating freshly cut biomass at the Bakuriani field station. We are grateful to Gulnara Badridze for her support during the biomass drying process. We would like to thank Kolia Khetsuriani for making it possible to stay and work at the field station in the Bakuriani Alpine Botanical Garden. At this stage, this research would not have been possible without the Bakuriani field station. Finally, we thank the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable feedback and suggestions that improved the manuscript.</p>
    </ack>
    <sec sec-type="Additional information" id="sec19">
      <title>Additional information</title>
      <sec sec-type="Conflict of interest" id="sec20">
        <title>Conflict of interest</title>
        <p>The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Ethical statement" id="sec21">
        <title>Ethical statement</title>
        <p>No ethical statement was reported.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Artificial Intelligence (AI) use" id="sec22">
        <title>Artificial Intelligence (AI) use</title>
        <p>The authors accept full responsibility for the content of the manuscript, including the disclosure of any use of AI. No AI tools were used in the preparation of this manuscript.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Funding" id="sec23">
        <title>Funding</title>
        <p>No funding is reported.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Author contributions" id="sec24">
        <title>Author contributions</title>
        <p>GT planned the research; GT, AB, DK, and TJ conducted the field sampling; GT and TJ identified herbarium specimens and harmonised the nomenclature of species with international databases; ZK, GT, LR and GM performed the statistical analyses and led the writing; NM Create a map of the study area; LR consulted in different stage of study, SS Resolving administrative issues arising during the research and reviewing local so-called "grey" literature; all authors critically revised the manuscript.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Author ORCIDs" id="sec25">
        <title>Author ORCIDs</title>
        <p>Giorgi Tedoradze <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8884-9177" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8884-9177</ext-link></p>
        <p>Arsena Bakhia <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3809-1124" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3809-1124</ext-link></p>
        <p>Giorgi Mikeladze <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4972-0562" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4972-0562</ext-link></p>
        <p>Leonid Rasran <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0956-9354" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0956-9354</ext-link></p>
        <p>Zaal Kikvidze <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5007-4484" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5007-4484</ext-link></p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Data availability" id="sec26">
        <title>Data availability</title>
        <p>All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <mixed-citation>Akhalkatsi M, Tarkhnishvili D (2012) Habitats of Georgia. GTZ, Tbilisi, GE, 118 pp.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <mixed-citation>Barberis D, Lombardi G, Ravetto Enri S, Pittarello M, Viglietti D, Freppaz M, Lonati M (2023) Nitrogen fertilizer enhances vegetation establishment of a high‐altitude machine‐graded ski slope. Restoration Ecology 31(1): 1–12. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/rec.13777" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13777</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <mixed-citation>Barrantes O, Reiné R, Ferrer C (2013) Changes in Land Use of Pyrenean Mountain Pastures — Ski Runs and Livestock Management — Between 1972 and 2005 and the Effects on Subalpine Grasslands. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 45(3): 318–329. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1657/1938-4246-45.3.318" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1657/1938-4246-45.3.318</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <mixed-citation>Braun-Blanquet J (1964) Pflanzensoziologie, Grundzüge Der Vegetation skunde. 3 Aufl./J. Braun-Blanquet. Springer-Verlag, Wien-New York, 865 pp. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/978-3-7091-8110-2" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-8110-2</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <mixed-citation>Callaway RM, Kikvidze Z, Kikodze D (2000) Facilitation by unpalatable weeds may conserve plant diversity in overgrazed meadows in the Caucasus Mountains. Oikos 89(2): 275–282. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.890208.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.890208.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <mixed-citation>Chytrý M, Řezníčková M, Novotný P et al. (2024) FloraVeg.EU – an online database of European vegetation, habitats and flora. Applied Vegetation Science 27: e12798. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/avsc.12798" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12798</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <mixed-citation>Cole D N, Monz C A (2002) Trampling Disturbance of High-Elevation Vegetation, Wind River Mountains, Wyoming, U.S.A. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 34(4): 365–376. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/15230430.2002.12003507" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/15230430.2002.12003507</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <mixed-citation>Danielsen ACS, Hermansen C, Weber P L, Mikstas D, Pesch C, de Carvalho Gomes L, Gutierrez S, Nielsen PH, Greve MH, Møldrup P, Normand S, de Jonge LW (2025) Soil water repellency in natural and semi-natural habitats: a nexus between abiotic factors and prokaryotic communities. European Journal of Soil Science 76(2): e70063. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/ejss.70063" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.70063</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <mixed-citation>Davlianidze M, Gviniashvili T, Mukbaniani M, Jinjolia-Imnadze L, Jugeli T (2018) Nomenclatural checklist of flora of Georgia. Universal, Tbilisi, 296 pp.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <mixed-citation>De Cáceres M, Legendre P, Moretti M (2010). Improving indicator species analysis by combining groups of sites. Oikos 119(10): 1674-1684. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18334.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18334.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <mixed-citation>Elizbarashvili N, Sulkhanishvili N, Elizbarashvili R (2021) Main problems of the sustainable development of south Caucasus and processes of transformation of landscape (ecosystem) biodiversity. In: Öztürk M, Altay V, Efe R (Eds) Biodiversity, Conservation and Sustainability in Asia. Springer, Cham., 339-354. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/978-3-030-59928-7_12" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59928-7_12</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <mixed-citation>European Environment Agency. Europe’s Ecological Backbone: Recognising the True Value of Our Mountains. EEA Report No. 6/2010, Publications Office of the European Union, 2010. European Environment Agency. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/europes-ecological-backbone">www.eea.europa.eu/publications/europes-ecological-backbone</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <mixed-citation>Fick SE, Hijmans RJ (2017) WorldClim 2: New 1-Km Spatial Resolution Climate Surfaces for Global Land Areas. International Journal of Climatology 37(12): 4302–4315. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1002/joc.5086" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5086</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <mixed-citation>GBIF (2026) Global Biodiversity Information Facility. <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.gbif.org" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.gbif.org</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <mixed-citation>Georgian National Tourism Administration (2026) Tourism Review. <ext-link xlink:href="https://gnta.ge/en/research" ext-link-type="uri">https://gnta.ge/en/research</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <mixed-citation>Guna G (2019) Therapeutic value of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Arctium</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">lappa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> Linn.-a review. Asian Journal Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research 12 (7): 53-59. <ext-link xlink:href="10.22159/ajpcr.2019.v12i7.33870" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2019.v12i7.33870</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <mixed-citation>Győri F (2020) Health–Sports–Tourism: with the Prospects of Hungary. Foundation for Youth Activity and Lifestyle, Szeged. 160 pp.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <mixed-citation>Habel J C, Rasche L, Schneider U A, Engler J O, Schmid E, Rödder D, Meyer S T, Trapp N, Sos del Diego R, Eggermont H, Lens L, Stork N E (2019) Final countdown for biodiversity hotspots. Conservation Letters 12(6): 1-9. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/conl.12668" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12668</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <mixed-citation>Hammer Ø, Harper D A, Ryan P D (2001) PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4(1): 1-9. <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.nhm.uio.no/english/research/resources/past/" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.nhm.uio.no/english/research/resources/past/</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20">
        <mixed-citation>Hudek C, Barni E, Stanchi S, D’Amico M, Pintaldi E, Freppaz M (2020) Mid and long-term ecological impacts of ski run construction on alpine ecosystems. Scientific Reports 10: 11654. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1038/s41598-020-67341-7" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67341-7</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21">
        <mixed-citation>Javakhishvili N (1956) Post-forest meadows of Bakuriani district. PhD Thesis, Academy of Sciences of the Georgian SSR Institute of Botany, Tbilisi. [In Russian]</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22">
        <mixed-citation>Keller T, Pielmeier C, Rixen C, Gadient F, Gustafsson D, Stähli M (2004) Impact of artificial snow and ski-slope grooming on snowpack properties and soil thermal regime in a sub-alpine ski area. Annals of Glaciology 38: 314–318. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3189/172756404781815310" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3189/172756404781815310</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23">
        <mixed-citation>Ketskhoveli N, Kharadze A, Kutateladze Sh (1964) The Key to Plants of Georgia. Vol. I. Metsniereba, Tbilisi, 458 pp. [In Georgian]</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B24">
        <mixed-citation>Ketskhoveli N, Kharadze A, Kutateladze Sh (1969) The Key to Plants of Georgia. Vol. II. Metsniereba, Tbilisi, 506 pp. [In Georgian]</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B25">
        <mixed-citation>Ketskhoveli N, Kharadze A, Gagnidze R (1971–2011) Flora of Georgia. Volumes 1–16. Metsniereba, Tbilisi. [In Georgian]</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B26">
        <mixed-citation>Kikvidze Z (2020) Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Georgia: A Short History of the Caucasus. Routledge. ISBN: 978-1-003-13153-3. 150 pp.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B27">
        <mixed-citation>Klačanová S, Jarolímek I, Sabo P, Shapkin V, Májeková J (2024) Ski slopes as an unrecognized source of human impact on vegetation. Plant Ecology 225: 1155–1169 <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s11258-024-01461-2" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-024-01461-2</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B28">
        <mixed-citation>Körner Ch (2003) Alpine Plant Life: Functional Plant Ecology of High Mountain Ecosystems. Springer Science &amp; Business Media, 500 pp. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/978-3-030-59538-8" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59538-8</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B29">
        <mixed-citation>Lasram F B R, Hattab T, Halouani G, Romdhane M S, Le Loc’h F (2015) Modeling of beta diversity in Tunisian waters: predictions using generalized dissimilarity modeling and bioregionalisation using fuzzy clustering. PLoS ONE 10(7): e0131728. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1371/journal.pone.0131728" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131728</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B30">
        <mixed-citation>Lawniczak A, Drapikowska M, Celka Z, Szkudlarz P, Jackowiak B (2011) Response of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Anthoxanthum</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">odoratum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">A.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">aristatum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> to the different habitat types and nutrient concentration in soil. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 20 (9a): 2465–2474.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B31">
        <mixed-citation>Mayer R, Kaufmann R, Vorhauser K, Erschbamer B (2009) Effects of grazing exclusion on species composition in high-altitude grasslands of the Central Alps. Basic and Applied Ecology 10(5): 447–455. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.baae.2008.10.004" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2008.10.004</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B32">
        <mixed-citation>McCune B, Mefford M J (2006) PC-ORD, version 5.0, Multivariate analysis of ecological data. Glaneden Beach: MjM Solfware Design.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B33">
        <mixed-citation>Meijer zu Schlochtern MP, Rixen C, Wipf S, Cornelissen JH (2014) Management, winter climate and plant–soil feedbacks on ski slopes: a synthesis. Ecological Research 29: 583–592. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s11284-014-1141-6" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-014-1141-6</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B34">
        <mixed-citation>Mountain Resorts of Georgia (2017) Georgia’s Ambitious Ski Resort Development Plans as Core of the Mountain Tourism Development. <ext-link xlink:href="https://gnta.ge/en/library/ski-resort-development-plans" ext-link-type="uri">https://gnta.ge/en/library/ski-resort-development-plans</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B35">
        <mixed-citation>Myerburg MM, Ebersole JJ, Shoemaker LG, Heschel MS (2011) Limited plasticity of biomass allocation in alpine forbs, Pikes Peak, Colorado. Western North American Naturalist 71(3): 431–435. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3398/064.071.0312" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3398/064.071.0312</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B36">
        <mixed-citation>Nakhutsrishvili G, Sikharulidze S, Abdaladze O (2006) Bakuriani – Natural and Cultural Resources of the Borjomi Region. Institute of Botany, Tbilisi, Georgia, 56 pp.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B37">
        <mixed-citation>Nakhutsrishvili G, Grigalashvili N, Mtskhvetadze J, Chelidze D, Sikharulidze S (2009) Cecklist of the Flora of Bakuriani-Tskhratskaro. Universal, Tbilisi, Georgia, 69 pp.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B38">
        <mixed-citation>National Tourism Agency of Georgia (2015) Georgia’s Tourism Strategy 2025. <ext-link xlink:href="https://gnta.ge/en/research" ext-link-type="uri">https://gnta.ge/en/research</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B39">
        <mixed-citation>Olsen SL, Sandvik SM, Totland Ø (2013) Influence of two N-fixing legumes on plant community properties and soil nutrient levels in an alpine ecosystem. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 45(3): 363–371. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1657/1938-4246-45.3.363" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1657/1938-4246-45.3.363</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B40">
        <mixed-citation>Perez-Harguindeguy N, Diaz S, Garnier E, Lavorel S, Poorter H, Jaureguiberry P, Bret-Harte M S, Cornwell W K, Craine J M, Gurvich D E (2016) Corrigendum to: New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Australian Journal of Botany 64(8): 715–716. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1071/BT12225_CO" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1071/BT12225_CO</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B41">
        <mixed-citation>Petterson J (2005) Skiing around the World. ZetterQvist Förlag, Göteborg, 1056 pp.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B42">
        <mixed-citation>Pinheiro J, Bates D (2022) nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. Rpackage version 3.1-157. <ext-link xlink:href="https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme" ext-link-type="uri">https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B43">
        <mixed-citation>Pintaldi E, Hudek C, Stanchi S, Spiegelberger T, Rivella E, Freppaz M (2017) Sustainable soil management in ski areas: threats and challenges. Sustainability 9(11): 1-17. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3390/su9112150" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/su9112150</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B44">
        <mixed-citation>R Core Team (2025) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B45">
        <mixed-citation>REC Caucasus (2019) Pastures Management in Georgia. REC Caucasus, Tbilisi. <ext-link xlink:href="https://greenlands.ge/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/1574947976-1.pdf" ext-link-type="uri">https://greenlands.ge/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/1574947976-1.pdf</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B46">
        <mixed-citation>Ren F, Song W, Chen L, Mi Z, Zhang Z, Zhu W, Zhou H, Cao G, He JS (2017) Phosphorus does not alleviate the negative effect of nitrogen enrichment on legume performance in an alpine grassland. Journal of Plant Ecology 10(5): 822–830. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/jpe/rtw089" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtw089</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B47">
        <mixed-citation>Rixen C, Rolando A (2013) The impacts of skiing and related winter recreational activities on mountain environments. Bentham Science Publishers Soest, the Netherlands. <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.academia.edu/download/70907334/Ground-Dwelling_Arthropods_and_Ski-Piste20211001-16002-1g4al2d.pdf" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.academia.edu/download/70907334/Ground-Dwelling_Arthropods_and_Ski-Piste20211001-16002-1g4al2d.pdf</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B48">
        <mixed-citation>Roux-Fouillet P, Wipf S, Rixen C (2011) Long-term impacts of ski piste management on alpine vegetation and soils: ski piste impacts on vegetation and soil. Journal of Applied Ecology,48(4): 906–915. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01964.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01964.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B49">
        <mixed-citation>Scurlock JMO, Johnson K, Olson RJ (2002) Estimating net primary productivity from grassland biomass dynamics measurements. Global Change Biology 8(8): 736–753. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00512.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00512.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B50">
        <mixed-citation>Skokanová H, Unar P, Janík D, Havlíček M (2015) Potential influence of river engineering in two West Carpathian rivers on the conservation management of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Calamagrostis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">pseudophragmites</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>. Journal for Nature Conservation 25: 42–50. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.jnc.2015.03.002" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2015.03.002</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B51">
        <mixed-citation>Solomon JC, Schatz GE, Shulkina T (2014) Red list of the endemic plants of the Caucasus: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Iran, Russia, and Turkey. Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, 451 pp.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B52">
        <mixed-citation>Sundqvist MK, Sanders NJ, Wardle DA (2013) Community and ecosystem responses to elevational gradients: processes, mechanisms, and insights for global change. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 44(1): 261–280. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135750" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135750</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B53">
        <mixed-citation>Tedoradze G, Nakhutsrishvili G, Seip M, Theissen T, Waldhardt R, Otte A, Magiera A (2020) Terrain impacts the composition of the persistent soil seed bank: A case study of steep high mountain grasslands in the Greater Caucasus, Georgia. Phytocoenologia 50(1): 47–63.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B54">
        <mixed-citation>Tedoradze, G (2022) The importance of plant community structure and soil seed banks for productivity and sustainable use of pastures and hay meadows on the slopes in Khevi, a high mountain region in the Central Greater Caucasus, PhD Thesis. Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia. <ext-link xlink:href="http://eprints.iliauni.edu.ge/id/eprint/11130" ext-link-type="uri">http://eprints.iliauni.edu.ge/id/eprint/11130</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B55">
        <mixed-citation>Theissen T, Otte A, Waldhardt R (2022) High-mountain landscape classification to analyze patterns of land use and potential natural vegetation. Land 11(7): 1–20. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3390/land11071085" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/land11071085</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B56">
        <mixed-citation>van der Maarel E (2007) Transformation of cover-abundance values for appropriate numerical treatment-Alternatives to the proposals by Po dani. Journal of Vegetation Science 18: 767–770. <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/4499286" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.jstor.org/stable/4499286</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B57">
        <mixed-citation>Vitousek PM, Cassman K, Cleveland C, Crews T, Field CB, Grimm NB, Howarth RW, Marino R, Martinelli L, Rastetter EB, Sprent JI (2002) Towards an ecological understanding of biological nitrogen fixation. Biogeochemistry 57–58(1): 1–45. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1023/A:1015798428743" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015798428743</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B58">
        <mixed-citation>Wiesmair M, Otte A, Waldhardt R (2017) Relationships between plant diversity, vegetation cover, and site conditions: implications for grassland conservation in the Greater Caucasus. Biodiversity and Conservation 26(2): 273–291. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s10531-016-1240-5" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1240-5</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B59">
        <mixed-citation>Wipf S, Rixen C, Fischer M, Schmid B, Stoeckli V (2005) Effects of ski piste preparation on alpine vegetation. Journal of Applied Ecology 42(2): 306–316. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01011.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01011.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B60">
        <mixed-citation>Wu L, Pinzon J (2022) Response of rove-beetle (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Staphylinidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) assemblages to the cumulative effect of wildfire and linear footprint in boreal treed peatlands. Ecology and Evolution 12(12): e9564. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1002/ece3.9564" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9564</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
    <sec sec-type="supplementary-material">
      <title>Supplementary materials</title>
      <supplementary-material id="S1" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/caucasiana.5.e207119.suppl1</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">7A5E1403-0768-5712-BD42-C99ED42D707F</object-id>
        <label>Supplementary material</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Supplementary material 1</p>
        </caption>
        <statement content-type="dataType">
          <label>Data type</label>
          <p>Images</p>
          <p>Explanation note: Supplementary figures showing the part of the study area under construction activities (Figure S1), general view of study areas (Figure S2), field sampling details (Figure S3), ordination scatterplots (CCA) illustrating community composition shifts (Figure S4) and cluster dendrogram for sampling plots (Figure S5).</p>
        </statement>
        <media xlink:href="caucasiana-05-147-s001.docx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" position="float" orientation="portrait" id="oo_1779618.docx">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1779618</uri>
        </media>
        <permissions>
          <license>
            <license-p>This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/">http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/</ext-link>). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.</license-p>
          </license>
        </permissions>
        <attrib specific-use="authors"> Tedoradze G</attrib>
      </supplementary-material>
      <supplementary-material id="S2" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/caucasiana.5.e207119.suppl2</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">F9AE4A56-CAE5-5160-9AFC-48BD26AA06B1</object-id>
        <label>Supplementary material</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Supplementary material 2</p>
        </caption>
        <statement content-type="dataType">
          <label>Data type</label>
          <p>Species list</p>
        </statement>
        <statement content-type="notes">
          <label>Explanation note</label>
          <p>The list of analysed species and their codes.</p>
        </statement>
        <media xlink:href="caucasiana-05-147-s002.docx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" position="float" orientation="portrait" id="oo_1785467.docx">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1785467</uri>
        </media>
        <permissions>
          <license>
            <license-p>This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/">http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/</ext-link>). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.</license-p>
          </license>
        </permissions>
        <attrib specific-use="authors"> Tedoradze G</attrib>
      </supplementary-material>
    </sec>
  </back>
</article>
